My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08-30-12 Redevelopment Commission Minutes
sbend
>
Public
>
Redevelopment Commission
>
Minutes
>
2010-2019
>
2012
>
08-30-12 Redevelopment Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/28/2012 12:06:14 PM
Creation date
9/28/2012 12:06:08 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
South Bend Redevelopment Commission <br /> Regular Meeting—August 30, 2012 <br /> 6. NEW BUSINESS (CONT.) <br /> E. Northeast Neighborhood Development Area <br /> (1) continued... <br /> desire to demolish some of the homes that lie <br /> along the electric lines, and staff is looking <br /> into whether the Commission can help with <br /> some of that demolition. <br /> Upon a motion by Mr. Varner, seconded by COMMISSION APPROVED PROPOSAL FOR UTILITY <br /> Mr. Downes and unanimously carried, the STUDY(PRIMARILY WATER AND SEWER)WITH <br /> Commission approved the proposal for a CHRISTOPHER BURKE ENGINEERING FOR THE <br /> INTERSECTION OF SR 23,EDDY STREET AND <br /> utility study (primarily water and sewer) with CORBY(FIVE-POINTS). <br /> Christopher Burke Engineering for the <br /> intersection of SR 23, Eddy Street and Corby <br /> (Five-Points). <br /> F. Douglas Road Economic Development Area <br /> There was no business in the Douglas Road THERE WAS NO BUSINESS IN THE DOUGLAS <br /> Economic Development Area. ROAD ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AREA. <br /> G. Ratification of Services Contracts <br /> 7. PROGRESS REPORTS <br /> Ms. Jones reported on the special meeting held on <br /> August 28, 2012, for residents who wished to be heard <br /> regarding the Fellows Street project. Folks listened, <br /> they were happy to ask questions, they wanted to know <br /> the options available, how they were determined and <br /> what impact they would have on the neighborhood. <br /> They were concerned about the timeline. Some were <br /> very concerned because some of them had made plans to <br /> move on. Many were happy to leave their homes and <br /> there was also a concern for those left behind. <br /> Mr. Varner noted that the Commission asked staff <br /> 11 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.