My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
RM 03-11-83
sbend
>
Public
>
Redevelopment Commission
>
Minutes
>
1980-1989
>
1983
>
RM 03-11-83
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/5/2012 3:47:29 PM
Creation date
9/26/2012 4:17:09 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
South Bend Rodevelopment Commission <br />Regular Meet'ng — March 11, 1983 <br />3. APPROVAL OF CLAIMS (Cont.) <br />Grand Total <br />Im <br />There were no communications. <br />5. OLD <br />a. <br />Re ilitation Loan <br />with the recommenda <br />Housiinq. <br />Name <br />$32,053.46 <br />quested for awarding <br />onnection with the <br />ogram in accordance <br />n from the Bureau of <br />Contractor Amount <br />Nannie th Jurtin's Const. Co. $12,441.00 <br />1137 W. efferson <br />Mr. Hunt explained that Commission approval <br />is requested for awarding a bid in connection <br />with property located at 1137 W. Jefferson in <br />the immunt. of $12,441.00. The Bureau of Housing's <br />estimate is at $12,072.00. This is a bid that <br />would go to Jurtin Construction based upon a <br />prev'ous bid recommendation being rejected by <br />the Redevelopment Commission. <br />Mr. Robinson asked if this was the same bid <br />that was presented at the last meeting or if <br />the contract had been rebid. <br />Ms. Holston stated that it was the same, other <br />than the loan amount which had been increased. <br />Mr. Robinson stated that there were questions <br />abou the other bid and since it was the same <br />one e still had the same questions. <br />Mr. Hunt asked if his question was in terms of <br />the Pureau of Housing cost estimate or the bid <br />spr d. <br />Mr. Pobinson stated that it was in the bid spread. <br />Ms. Schwartz explained that we have already ac- <br />cepted the bids. They have been advertised and <br />the cnvdssion last meeting rejected the lowest <br />bid. The next lowest bid is recommended for <br />ConmLssion approval. <br />Mr. obinson stated that he thought we were <br />goin to rebid the contract. He said that <br />-3- <br />THERE WERE NO COMMUNICATIONS <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.