My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
RM 01-16-81
sbend
>
Public
>
Redevelopment Commission
>
Minutes
>
1980-1989
>
1981
>
RM 01-16-81
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/5/2012 4:06:36 PM
Creation date
9/26/2012 11:27:42 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
21
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
South Bend edevelopment Commission <br />Regular Mee ing - January 16, 1981 <br />6. NEW BUS <br />a. Mrs1 Kolata continues... <br />the bid and if they are interested in more days I <br />have not heard anything. I tend to doubt it be- <br />cause we have been getting information from them <br />on a regular basis I don't think that they are <br />going to need extra days. We will address that <br />for ally if they ask for it. <br />Mr. Nimtz: The proper procedure here is that we <br />have a motion to approve the agreement for pro- <br />fessional services with the Abstract Company of COMMISSION ENTERED INTO <br />St. Joseph County Inc. AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL <br />SERVICES WITH ABSTRACT <br />Mr. Cira made a motion to approve the agreement for COMPANY OF ST. JOSEPH <br />pro essional services with the Abstract Company of COUNTY, INC. REGARDING <br />St. Joseph County Inc. Ms. Auburn seconded the MONROE- SAMPLE AREA <br />mot on and it was unanimously carried. <br />b. Com fission approval requested to enter into an agree- <br />men for professional services with Territorial Engin- <br />eer ng regarding the Monroe - Sample Area. <br />Mr. McMahon: This item relates to the same area, <br />Mon oe- Sample. It affects the same property that we <br />wer abstracting. We requested proposals to do sur- <br />vey work in that area and the low proposal was sub- <br />mitted by a firm called Territorial Engineering which <br />ope ates out of Knox, Indiana. The principals in the <br />firin have been from South Bend and have worked in this <br />are , and I have had some personal experience with re- <br />spe t to them with performing services for the City <br />bef re and found that they have performed. With re- <br />spe t to their submittal, they are substantially lower, <br />ove all about $2,000.00, then the comparative offer <br />by ang, Feeney and Associates, who we thought quite <br />fra kly would get it. Due to the nature of the work <br />we feel comfortable recommending them to the Commis - <br />sio at this time for an award for this survey work. <br />Mr.�Nimtz: You say they have done work in this area <br />bef re? Their principals have? <br />Mr.IMcMahon: That is correct.. <br />Mr.Nimtz: Any questions? <br />Ms. <br />Derbeck: What sort of things will they be surveying? <br />7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.