RM 03-21-80 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

South Be Regular Redevelopment Commission ting - March 21, 1980 4. CONrvtUNICATIONS (continued) Ms. (Auburn continues..... tal ing about long -term leases, we are talking about sho t term usage of some downtown area. I don't have any problem with delegating that responsibility and fle ibility to the staff. Mr. Robinson: I would hope, because of the present conditions of some of the buildings, that our legal staff would be involved as well as the Redevelopment staff to insure that if something happens beyond our control (that we are not truly responsible for) that we aren't going to get involved with a lot of litigation. Mr. Ellison: If there is negotiation it might cen er along costs, but the normal requirements rel tive to our rights, and tenants rights being spe led out would of course be contained in the Mr. Cira: To avoid showing any partiality, W. Ellison, I feel you should treat everyone the same way. The same dollar per square foot and everybody carries their own liability insurance. Mr. Ellison: Liability insurance is indeed required. We don't know yet to what extent there is a market for the space, but one objective is to try to fill the space. If we were, for instance, to have it appraised and establish economic rents, we don't know we could lease it. D1s. Auburn: Some of the buildings may be different too as there may be more fixtures left in them. I would assume that Business Systems space is still more usable than Gallenkamp's and the Fabric Store. I believe they pulled everything out of those two structures. Mr. Ellison: That is correct so we can't have a flat rat because of the space quality differences from bui ding to building. Ms. Auburn: It would cost me more to move in as a Lessee because I would have to get hookups etc. Mr: Ellison: That is correct. Some stores are in TAorse condition than others. Therefore the cost to ome tenants would be greater in terms of -14-