Laserfiche WebLink
South Bend Redevelopment Commission <br />Regular Me ting October 17, 1980 <br />6. NEW BU INESS <br />d. Mrs. Baumgartner continues... <br />think that that is encouraging just in terms of <br />what you all were watching closely in terms of <br />approval of the loan. <br />Ms Derbeck: Have I got it clear then that these <br />arE to correct code violations that were missed <br />in the initial inspections? <br />Mrs. Baumgartner; Right. HUD says that vie deter- <br />mire that these were missed, and has approved that <br />we use Community Development funds to pay for the <br />corrections, <br />Mr McMahon: At no cost to the property owner. <br />Mr. Nimtz: But these are not items that the <br />or ginal contractor was supposed to do. He is <br />be ng called back on those items to re -do those <br />it ms. These were things that were missed by the <br />inspector to bring it up to code. <br />Mr. Nimtz: Do I hear a motion that is suggested <br />by the Chair. <br />Mr. Butler: A question. Are all of the con- <br />tractors to whom you are recommending the bids be <br />awarded, have they been doing work with the Bureau, <br />an has their work been acceptable? <br />Mrs. Baumgartner: Yes. We have done approximately <br />40 of these contracts already for which the Bureau <br />has contracted. Just recently the Legal Depart - <br />me t has been doing a review of the contract pro - <br />ce ure and has determined that the Bureau cannot sign <br />co tracts, therefore all of these are coming to you <br />no , and you will be seeing home improvement loan <br />co tracts, etc., since we can no longer sign more <br />co tracts. <br />Mr. McMahon: Kathy, how many more properties would <br />th Commission expect to see in this regard, or is <br />this the last? <br />21 <br />