Laserfiche WebLink
South Bend Redevelopment Commission <br />Regular Meeting T November 16, 1979 <br />7. PROGRESS REPORTS <br />a. Mr. Ellison continues... <br />with whatever they intend to do. <br />With respect to the four proposals, we think three warran- <br />ted great consideration. The one proposal regarding the <br />conversion of the building to housing, we decided very <br />early on, should.not warrant further consideration because <br />the proposal is too problematic. There are too many con- <br />ditions associated with it. If FHA insurance is available, <br />if an approval can be received in 60 days, and on, and on. <br />We also felt that their proposal gave no market data and <br />did not demonstrate that there exists within South Bend a <br />capacity to rent residential space in the Odd Fellows <br />Building at, the rents indicated.. Finally and most signifi- <br />cantly, we felt that the proposal would require a change in <br />the Urban.Renewal Plan.which we think would compete with <br />publicly acknowledged plans for the East Bank, which call <br />for a substantial rehab residential emphasis. We also felt <br />that the developer's proposition under which the Commission <br />or the City would be asked to provide approximately 50 <br />parking spaces on a lease basis inside a public garage <br />facility to be built is unrealistic since the City does not <br />offer parking on a 24 hour a day basis. So because of the <br />parking, because of the need to change the Urban Renewal <br />Plan and the conditions associated with that proposal, the <br />staff, at least in its consideration, eliminated it very <br />early on as simply being not suitable. <br />With respect to the other three proposals, we have had what <br />I would describe as limited conversation with the prospec- <br />tive developers. We were not concerned so much about trying <br />to ask a million questions to get some absolute assurance <br />that the proposal could work financially, because in the <br />first place none of them appeared to work financially. <br />The all appeared to need some additional work before a <br />lender would buy into them. We did that intentionally so <br />as to avoid being in a position, if you will, of negotiating <br />with prospective developers while they are competing with <br />one another. That may or may not have been a wise thing to <br />do, but we felt it appropriate particularly when we began to <br />realize more and more certain significant things. One signi- <br />ficant thing is that, the Odd Fellows Building as an office <br />facility, apparently was not going to survive without public <br />sector intervention. The first public action was to acquire <br />the building and to relocate its tenants. Our analysis <br />seems to reveal that that had a positive effect on older <br />office space in and around downtown South Bend. Further <br />we note that even though we spent some $288,000 to acquire <br />the building, and approximately another $50,000 to relocate <br />the tenants, that even if we were to sell the building to <br />-17- <br />