My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
RM 03-04-77
sbend
>
Public
>
Redevelopment Commission
>
Minutes
>
1970-1979
>
1977
>
RM 03-04-77
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/5/2012 5:14:22 PM
Creation date
9/24/2012 12:31:03 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
7. PROGROSS REPORTS (Continued): <br />table this morning. I wonder if it might not be in the best interest <br />of thE committee sitting here, for our secretary to keep a listing of <br />the contractors and the awards that are brought. to this table. I pre- <br />sume we are talking about a period not to exceed about six months for <br />the listing. It should be kept current, and we can see when these <br />contractors, who we think are . . . should we say, we think we are <br />getti g the business a little bit . . . we can see when they come back <br />to thE well to get a little more money on these bids that they have <br />made on these particular projects. Or, do you think this is unreasonable? <br />The C air indicated that it was not unreasonable and Mr. Schaller was <br />asked by Mr. Brownell if he could furnish that information to us. Mr. <br />Schaller stated that he would do so. <br />The C air then noted that in addition, it is necessary to tighten up <br />the i spection process which is being done, but to keep the inspection <br />down to the fine points which apparently we missed in previous months <br />and years. Apparently, they are doing a much better job, but we have <br />to ke p the pressure on to see that it is done correctly. <br />Mr. R binson: Because if this is the secret formula of various people <br />biddi g this work, and they think the answer is to bid a few hundred <br />dollars low, and then come back and get an extra all the time, maybe <br />we car curtail this activity in the future or at least this <br />practice. <br />Mr. Wiggins: It still leaves us hanging on this one though, doesn't it? <br />Ms. D rbeck: (In response to Mr. Nimtz's question regarding comments <br />from the press or others) . . . I wish to clarify what Mr. Robinson <br />wants to do. Does he want to have a list of the contract awards . . <br />or dos he want to have a comparison with the low bidders to see if <br />they later go over the high bid? <br />The C air: He wants a list of the contracts and the contractors that <br />are awarded these contracts, then the changes that are made before the <br />compl tion of the job. <br />Ms. D rbeck: You aren't going to compare it with the high bidder? <br />The C air: No, he wants to see if contractor "B" is coming back fre- <br />quent y for Change Orders or Contractor-"D", what the frequency <br />of ch nge is. <br />Mr. Wilggins: If these changes are well distributed, this is what he <br />wouldllike to know. <br />Mr. <br />inson: Or if this is a habit with them. <br />-13- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.