RM 11-05-76 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

4. CORRESPONDENCE a. HUD Area Office letter dated October 20, 1976: This letter is CONTRACT 39 from Daniel B. Bowman, Director, Housing Production and Mortgage WAGE RATE Credit Division and enclosed a wage rate decision IN 76 -2083 for DECISION Demolition and Site Clearance Contract No. 39, Block 6, Project IND R -66 Indiana R -66 and includes Modification No. 1, dated 8 -13 -1976, No. 2 dat d 8 -20 -1976 and No. 3 dated 9- 3- 1976 ........... Ten days prior to ope ing of bids or final contract sales or award, you should con- tact this office in writing for the updated wage decision and modifications." b. UD Area Office letter dated October 21, 1976: This letter is IPA AUDIT fro Mr. James E. Armstrong, Area Director, enclosing the original CONTRACT and one copy of IPA Audit Contract for Project Indiana R -57 and IND R -57 stating that paragraph seven (7) of the contract should be amended to include the following statement: "A statement identifying such certification or license shall be attached to this agreement." "T e cost of an IPA audit is an eligible project cost. You should not pay the audit fee until you are authorized to do so by this office."' c. iUD Area Office letter dated October 28, 1976: This letter is DISPOSITION froi Mr. Stephen J. Havens, Director, Community Planning & Develop- PARCEL 2 -6A, ment Division regarding the proposed sale of land in Central Down- 2 -6B, 2 -6C town Project IN R -66, Disposition Parcel 2 -6. Mr. Havens requested IND R -66 that we submit the re -use plan for these three parcels prior to suci sale since a parcel of this size may require zoning variance or ould create a serious marketability problem in the future. Upon receipt of this letter, C. Wayne Brownell telephoned Ms. Jac ueline Schmidt and explained the proposed disposition of these thr e parcels - in detail, and she indicated we should go ahead and pas the resolution at this meeting and send her a copy of that res lution with a letter confirming our telephone conversation. Fol owing a discussion, Mr. Robinson made a motion, seconded by Mr. Wig ins, to receive these letters and place them on file. 5. OLDI BUSINESS. a. Plaza Park Railing Contract, Project R -66: Mr. Brownell advised PLAZA PARK thal this contract was awarded to G. R. Nunemaker Construction in RAILING bid amount of $996.00, at the Commission Meeting of October 15, 1976. CONTRACT He then read a letter from Mr. Nunemaker dated November 3, 1976, IND R -66 which indicated that there was an error "of $1,000.00 in the con ract amount. The bid should have read $1,996.00. The job was figured last summer and was to be done in the warm months. As S1 al result of this letter Mr. Brownell said he then asked Mr. ugh to contact the three firms who had quoted on the contract - 3 -