SM 07-01-76 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

6. NEW OUSINESS (Cont'd nd go from there. I can see how it might be worthwhile to exceed hat under certain circumstances, and that is basically what we are rying to find out.here. We want a little more in -depth to look at t. otion was seconded by Mr. Robinson and carried. f. han a Order n Southeast . 1 to Rehabilitation Contract No.'SECD /PR /CS -3/20, nmunity Development Housing Program: Commission ap- roval was requested for this Change Order, with Fleming Construc ion Company, for an increase in contract amount of $83.00, Contract: $5,570.00), or an amended contract total of $5,653.00, or rehabilitation work at: 310 East Dubail Street, in the South- ast Community Development Housing Program. !r. James L. Johnson, Jr., Chief Inspector, stated the speci.fica- ions called for painting the bathroom walls and tiling the ceil- ng, but as he inspected the house the bathroom walls and ceiling re already covered with plastic tile so this obviously was an rror on the initial inspection. The money is now being utilized o tile the dining room with 3/8" underlayment which amounts to 198.00, and the painting of the bathroom walls and installing eiling tile is being deleted in amount of $115.00, leaving an ncrease to contract amount of $83.00. ommissioner Wiggins said this sounds like a fair deal and moved or the approval of Change Order No. 1 to Rehabilitation Contract o. SECD /PR /CS -3/20, for an increase in contract amount of $83.00 r an amended contract total of 5,653.00, with Fleming Construc- ion Company, in the Southeast Community Development Housing rogram. Motion was seconded by Mr. Robinson and carried. r. Dan Caesar asked if there have been any surveys taken on how he homes have been kept and maintained after these improvements re made to insure that the homeowners maintain these homes? Mr. righton said the Project Area Committees and the Advisory Boards hich are the neighborhood residents on the Board are responsible or the monitoring of whether the people are maintaining their omes. Housing maintenance is a kind of delicate situation in erms of what a person considers proper maintenance over what nother person does, but generally the Project Area Advisory, oards are pretty thorough because they are neighborhood residents oncerned with the success of the programs and the success of the eighborhoods. Generally they are being kept up. No formal reports re made. The information is relayed in monthly Committee meetings. ommissioner Robinson asked if it is a set policy that once the taff inspects these houses and the homeowners are granted funds o improve the residence, if there has ever been a time when the unds have been granted more than once to rehabilitate the same ouse, or is this a one -time deal? Mr. Crighton advised it is the olicy that it is a one -time grant only; we take no repeat perfor -_ ances within the same program. - 10 - CHANGE ORDER NO.1 TO REHAB. CONTRACT SECD /PR /CS- 3/20 AP- PROVED, SECD HOUSING PROGRAM