My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
RM 05-07-76
sbend
>
Public
>
Redevelopment Commission
>
Minutes
>
1970-1979
>
1976
>
RM 05-07-76
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/22/2013 7:31:41 PM
Creation date
9/21/2012 3:08:42 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
23
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
6. NEW BUSINESS (Cont'd <br />City of South Bend forces and which had been removed from <br />Co tract by Change Order No. 1 .......................... $ 445.00 <br />Total Increase ............ $2,481.30 <br />Less Decrease ............. 991.50 <br />Net Increase ......... $1,489.80 <br />Commissioner Robinson said the question he has doesn't exactly pertain <br />to this request for added funds, but he asked Mr. Slabaugh, "Could you <br />tell me approximately how much money Nautilus Construction Company has <br />left in their so- called bank to complete this construction job ?" Mr. <br />Slabaugh advised the balance that will be left with the above amount <br />approved for payment is $83,538.40. Commissioner Robinson said he will <br />get to that a little later in this meeting. <br />Motion was made by Mr. Wiggins, seconded by Mr. Cira and carried, for <br />the approval of Change Order No. 3 to Plaza Park Contract No. 1, with <br />Nautilus Construction Corporation, for an increase in contract amount <br />of 1,489.80, or an amended contract total of $201,248.30, in Project <br />Indiana R -66. Subject to Legal Counsel and HUD approval. <br />d. Change Order No. 4 to Plaza Park Contract No. 1, Indiana R -66: <br />Com ission approval was requested of Change Order No. 4 to Plaza <br />Par< Contract No. 1, with Nautilus Construction Corporation, for <br />a t irty (30) day extension of time, or a contract completion date <br />of lune 1`5, 1976, per memorandum dated May 6, 1976, from the Bureau <br />of ublic Construction, Project Indiana R -66. <br />Mr. Brownell read the letter which stated they have no objection <br />to the request providing that "no delay whatsoever shall be caused <br />in the completion of work by other contractors. A change order <br />for extra work items, over -runs or under -runs is being processed <br />wit the new date of contract completion. With your approval, legal <br />cou sel and HUD concurrence, the time is extended 30'days to June 15, <br />197 <br />Motion was made by Mr. Wiggins for the time extension and seconded <br />by 4r. Donaldson. The Chair asked if there were any further ques- <br />tio s, and Commissioner Robinson responded against the motion, <br />"I im against this so- called motion that we are prepared to take a <br />vota on,for the simple reason that they have asked for a delay once <br />.before due to weather; I think that is beyond their control. I <br />think the reason they are asking for this increase in time now could <br />be under their control. My other reason is to be fair to the <br />employers in our area where they work in hazardous areas where they <br />mig t be subjected to vandalism, they should have their own security <br />sys em. It seems as though this construction company of Nautilus- - <br />the ' want our city policemen and people like this to do this on the <br />time of the taxpayers' money to protect their property and their <br />jobs. How much more lenient is this Board or the Commission here <br />goi g to take on their behalf, when if it was some other contractor, <br />or ven a contract that is sometimes awarded to various subcontractors <br />or eneral contractors where they have penalty clauses on the time <br />lim t; if he gets an extension of time every time he comes and asks <br />for it, he never will have any incentive to get the darn project done." <br />We <br />CHANGE <br />ORDER NO. <br />4 TO PLAZA <br />PARK CONTRACT <br />NO. 1 AP- <br />PROVED, R -66 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.