Laserfiche WebLink
6. 04D BUSINESS (Cont'd <br />Mr. Chenney objected to the wording of the motion that we buy <br />ahem if they agree to bolt them together, and, consequently, <br />the motion is amended and the Chair emphasized, "No bolts, no <br />money: Mr. Wiggins amended his motion that the firm is to <br />bolt the benches together, then payment is authorized for the <br />two benches at the above noted cost figures, and that if they <br />don't bolt them together, we do not buy them. Mr. Donaldson <br />seconded the amended motion, Mr. Chenney agreed to the amended <br />version, along with Mr. Nimtz, and motion was carried. <br />7. NOW BUSINESS <br />a. Audit NDP A -10 Project: Authorization was requested to enter <br />into a contract with Goodson - Tyler & Associates, to audit NDP <br />A -10 Project, for close -out, in amount not to exceed $1,810.00, <br />subject to HUD approval. <br />The following accounting firms were contacted by mail to submit <br />bids for the audit, and the bids received were: <br />1) Price Waterhouse & Company .................... $ 3,500.00 <br />2) Goodson -Tyler & Associates .................... 1,810.00 <br />3) Peat, Marwick, Mitchell & Company ............. 4,535.00 <br />4) Crowe, Chizek and Company ..................... 2,285.00 <br />The low bid received was from Goodson -Tyler & Associates, in <br />bid amount of $1,810.00. This firm was previously approved by <br />HUD for our audit of the Indiana R -66 project. <br />Motion was made by Mr. Wiggins, seconded by Mr. Chenney and <br />carried, for the contract to be awarded to the low bidder, <br />Goodson -Tyler & Associates, to audit the NDP A -10 Project, <br />for close -out, in amount of $1,810.00, and the President and <br />Secretary authorized to enter into said contract, subject to <br />Legal Counsel and HUD approval.. <br />b. Amendments to the Community Development Housing Rehabilitation <br />Assistance Guidelines, E -7: The E -7 Advisory Committee suggested <br />the following amendments to the Community development Housing <br />Rehabilitation Assistance Gudielines: <br />1) That a limit of $8,000 be established for all applications <br />for assistance. This limit would apply to the LPA's <br />cost estimate and would serve as a feasibility cut -off <br />for all structures in our program. Those applicants re- <br />quiring more than an estimated $8,000 repair to their home <br />would be rejected by the E -7 Committee and notified of <br />their right to appeal this rejection. <br />NDP A -10 <br />PROJECT <br />AUDIT, <br />AWARDED TO: <br />000DSON- <br />TYLER & <br />ASSOCIATES <br />COMMUNITY <br />DEVELOPMENT <br />HOUSING <br />REHABILITA- <br />TION ASSIS- <br />TANCE GUIDE- <br />LINES <br />AMENDED, <br />E -7 <br />