RM 06-06-75 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

6. NEW OUSINESS (Cont'd culptures as well as the prize money. The only amount of money he Hickey Company had coming to them was for the foundations for he sculpture pieces, so it reduced the Part "B" of bid proposal Page 34) by $23,636.04. That is why we basically have a decrease n the change order; otherwise, we would have an increase. ommissioner Wiggins said in short they had $6,363.96 in bui'l,ding he bases, to which Mr. Oester•ling replied, "That is correct." ach dollar is documented in the voluminous packet= -we have letters ated and backdated, I and everything is explaine'd.in detail for ach particular item in the contract and we feel that it warrants pproval. Page 5 of the Final Change Order delineates the comple- ion of tre actual acceptance dates of the contract, which will e the basis on which the maintenance will take place "As reported by The Hickey Company in its letter of December 30, 1974, the following dates have been established for final acceptance of the project: "Site Block Plans l thru 12 and 21 August 1, 1974 Site Block Plans 17A thru 20A - August 16, 1974 Pool "B" East (Site Block Plan 20A) October 1, 1974" egal Counsel said this does call for acceptance of the project ated back to August 1, 1974 for certain parts of thE, project; ugust 16 for additional parts of the project; and October l or the third part of thE: project--apparently-the Pool "B" East. 'Notion was made by Mr. Wiggins, seconded by Mr. Chenney and carried, to approve the final Change Order, No. 16, to Contract 5, Phase III, with The Hickey Company, for a decrease in contract amount of $1,324.08, and final acceptance of the project with above established dates; also authorization for execution of the Certificate of Comple- tion for Contract 5 with The Hickey Company. All subject to Legal Counsel approval. c. St. Joseph County Airport Authority District Contract: Commission Legal Counsel requested authorization for the negotiation and pre- paration of this contract, and execution of same. Mr. Brownell advised the St. Joseph County Airport Authority has approached us on the basis that they are a Federal Agency and want to extend their airport and acquire land and relocate people. As we have staff trained in the acquisition of real estate and relo- cation, they have been advised that they should use our staff, rather than hire and train a new staff of their own. Consequently, they have approached us about a contract on which this work could be done for them. Our Legal Counsel would prepare the contract. Motion was made by Mr. Wiggins, seconded by Mr. Donaldson and carried, to authorize Mr. Butler and Mr. Brownell to prepare and negotiate a contract, and authorization for the execution of the contract. �:i� ST. JOSEPH COUNTY AIRPORT AUTHORITY DISTRICT CONTRACT