RM 06-06-75 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

4. COMMUNICATIONS (Cont'd r. Brownell advised Mr. Frank Alford will be completing these eports, as he has in the past, which are due on a semi- annual asis. On motion by Mr. Wiggins, seconded by Mr. Chenney and carried, the abov communications are to be received and placed on file. 5. OLD 6USINESS Theso items were deferred for discussion to the end of the meeting to allow time for the items of business on the Agenda. 6. NEW BUSINESS a. uit -Claim Deed to City of South Bend, Indiana A -10, Model ei hborhood Area No. : Mr. Kevin J. Butler, Commission egal Counsel, prepared this Quit -Claim Deed and authoriza- ion is requested for thE; President and Secretary to execute ame. otion was so made by Mr. Donaldson, seconded by Mr. Wiggins nd carried. b. final Change Orders and Certificates of Completion on Contract os. 2 and 5, Site Improvements, Phase III, R -66: Mr. Brownel dvised we only have the change order- on Contract 5 at this ime. Contract No. 2 is the landscape contract and we still ave some minor items to be negotiated on this contract. r. Thomas A. Oesterling, our engineering consultant with Clyde . Williams and Associates, Inc., gave a` lengthy summarization f the final Change Order, No. 16, which is voluminous - -44 pages lus 40 pages substantiating the charges. Legal Counsel, Mr. utler, said he has not had a chance to study it for approval. r. Oesterling said this final change order is for a decrease in contract amount of $1,324.08. This may be somewhat misleading, nasmuch as many of these items were small items- -items that were given to the engineer under the direction of the Executive Direc- or throughout the life of the contract. The Hickey Company, on ovember 13, 1974, submitted a summarized letter which is part of he change order packet, outlining their intentions for the claims hich at that time amounted to $44,344.16. After that there were dditional negotiations and meetings with Mr. Brownell. Finally, ther matters were resolved, with a reduction of the amount to $ 6,913.70. QUIT -CLAIM DEED, NDP A-10, MN #1 CHANGE ORDER NO. 16, TO CONTRACT 5, PHASE III, R -66 1s to why we only have a net decrease of $1,324.08, Mr. Oesterling ;aid it basically comes from the sculptures. The $30,000 that was illowed for the sculpture pieces, as an alternate in the contract, ras included in the contract base bid. The Department of Redevelop - ient had paid the sculptors direct for the construction of the - 5 -