RM 04-05-74 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

4. COMMUNICATIONS (Cont' h HUD letter dated March 20, 1974: This letter is over the s gnature of Mr. Mark L. Griffin, Chief, Architectural and Engineering Section, re Change Order No. 2 to Demolition and. Site Clearance Contract No. 32, Indiana Project R -66. They do no concur with the additional expenditure of $500.00. This is th joint wall to Business Systems. HUD d sallowed this as an architect's error and do not understand why a set of drawings would not have sufficient dimensions and be sc led for bidding. Mr. L le nnon advised this is one that could not have been seen until the wall was torn down. This was a party wall. This will contested. CHANGE ORDER NO. 2 TO DEMOLITION & SITE CLEARANCE CONTRACT NO. 32, R -66 i HUD letter dated March 22, 1974: This letter is over CHANGE ORDER'NOS. the s gnature of Mr. Mark L. Griffin, Chief, Architectural and 3 & 5, PHASE II -C, Engineering Section, re Change Order Nos. 3 and 5, Phase II -C, R -66 with the Howell Construction Co., Inc., Project R -66. These were returned for more complete documentation on why they re being submitted as additions to the original project plan. We will comply with the request. j HUD letter dated March 22, 1974: This letter is over CHANGE ORDER NOS. the s gnature of Mr. Mark L. Griffin, Chief, Architectural.and 4 & 5, CONTRACT NO. Engin ering Section, re Change Order Nos. 4 and 5, to Contract 5, R -66 No. 5 with The Hickey Company, Inc., Project R -66. Chang Order No. 4 was returned as it concerns matter outside contr ct limits of HUD office. Chang Order No. 5 was returned with request to resubmit with copie of the Plan Sketch No. 2 mentioned in the change order. k HUD letter dated March 28, 1974: This letter is over DEMOLITION & SITE the signature of Mr. Daniel B. Bowman, Assistant Director, CLEARANCE CONTRACT Technical Services Branch, re Wage Determination for Contract NO. 2, A -10 No. 2 with Julius O'Neal Trucking Company, Project A -10. The #ge determination for this project is No. 73 -IN -314 and is in of ect until May 6, 1974. HUD E 0 Division directed letter to Mr. Alford dated March 12, 1974, requesting items of equal opportunity requirements. The reaue t is to be resubmitted with the documentation. 1. HUD letter dated March 26, 1974: This letter is over CONTRACT NO. 1, the signature of Ms. Joyce C. Rayfor , Equal Opportunity E -6 Specialist, re Contract No. 1, Model Neighborhood Code En- force ent Project E -6. The nondiscrimination form submitted for S nfaye, Inc. is incorrect, and the revised form is to be submi ted by April 5, 1974. '.I:M