RM 10-05-73 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

4. COMMUNICATIONS (Cont'd) b. HUD letter dated September 26, 1973: This letter is over THE PHILADELPHIA, the signature of Mr. Joseph D. Panaro, Acting Assistant Director, INC. RELOCATION, Planning and Relocation Branch, requesting additional information R -66 on moving cost estimates relating to The Philadelphia, Inc. and authorizing partial payment. Mr. Le non advised the Poledor Corporation, owners of the build- ing, his been notified and we have asked whether they want total paymen when HUD concurs, or partial payment at this time. We have n t received word from them, as yet. c. HUD letter dated September 26, 1973: This letter is over PROJECT NOTES, the signature of Mr. Emil Vitucci, Associate Regional Counsel for IND. A -10 Private Market Financing, advising receipt of Third Series, 1973, Project Notes and related documents for Project Ind. A -10. The documents have been distributed in accordance with established proced res and all actions necessary on behalf of the Government have b en completed. d. HUD letter dated September 26, 1973: This letter is over ENVIRONMENTAL the signature of Mr. H. L. Bainaka, Acting Director, Operations CLEARANCE REVIEW, Division and is in regard to environmental clearance review for R -57 Project Ind. R -57. Mr. Lennon advised our staff is working on the forms and the comple ion date for review is January 4, 1974. On motion by Rev. Williams, seconded by Mr. Wade and unani- mously carried, the letters are to be placed on record. 5. OLE, BUSINESS a. Special Commission Meeting, September 26, 1973: Mr. SPECIAL COMMISSION Lennon advised this meeting was set in the last Commission MEETING, SEPTEMBER meeting, September 21, for the results of the Court Hearing 26, CANCELLED on Parcel No. 4 -14, commonly called the Dan Clark property, to update the Commission and receive acquisition approval at that time. Mr. Cha vised a Dan Cla ment of tion su tion of 9th, to tion of of Rede County to to ke ^les A. Sweeney, Jr., Commission Legal Counsel, ad- i Friday, at 3:00 p.m., attorney May, representing * , agreed to withdraw the objections to the appoint - court- appointed appraisers and to withdraw his injunc- it. The appraisers were ordered to report their valua- the subject property by 10:00 a.m., Tuesday, October the Court. The only thing remaining is the adjudica- the purchase price. At that time, the Department Felopment will be in position to pay to the St. Joseph ;lerk the amount of the appeal and will be in position possession of the property for purposes of demolition.