Laserfiche WebLink
RN <br />NEW BUSINESS (Cont'd <br />On m tion by Mr. Wiggins, seconded by Mr. Chenney and <br />unanimously carried, the above - listed grant was approved. <br />g. NAHRO Indiana Chapter Quarterly Meetin • Approval NAHRO MEETING, <br />was equested of one 1 staff member to attend (Mr. Larry DECEMBER 6, 1972, <br />Wart a) the meeting in Columbus, Indiana, on December 6, COLUMBUS, INDIANA <br />1972 at cost of $5.00, plus transportation, meals and <br />lodging. The topic is the discussion of using private firms <br />to a dit renewal projects, rather than HUD auditors. <br />On m tion by Mr. Wiggins, seconded by Mr. Chenney and <br />unan mously carried, one staff member was authorized to <br />atte d. <br />h. Investment: Post approval was requested for INVESTMENT APPROVED <br />investment of $355,000.00 with the St. Joseph Bank & Trust <br />Company, for Project Temporary Loan Repayment Fund, for <br />a period of ninety (90) days. The investment will net <br />interest in amount of $4,251.12. <br />On m tion by Mr. Chenney, seconded by Mr. Wiggins, and <br />unan mously carried, post approval for this investment <br />was pproved. <br />The hair said this is already invested in U.S. Treasury <br />Bill due March 1, 1973. <br />i. Personnel Policy: This has been submitted to the PERSONNEL POLICY <br />Comm ssion for review and recommendations. The recommenda- APPROVED <br />tions have been incorporated and Commission approval is <br />requested of the new Personnel Policy, which clarifies the <br />responsibility of all the staff members. <br />On m tion by Mr. Wiggins, seconded by Mr. Chenney and <br />unan mously carried, the new Personnel Policy is approved, <br />repl cing the previous Personnel Policy. <br />was <br />thre <br />comb <br />This <br />and <br />spac <br />Pool <br />woul <br />capa <br />one i <br />tatic <br />show <br />j. Rehousing for Site Offices: Commission approval <br />equested to review our housing requirements for our <br />site offices and investigate different resources for <br />ning our present three site offices under one roof. <br />should be more in the proximity of the main office <br />ommission concurred unanimously to investigate if <br />can be made available in the County -City Building. <br />ng of our resources and staff in one general area <br />be of great benefit and improve our supervisory <br />ility. If space cannot be made available, then the <br />mendation is the three site offices be housed under <br />oof, as the Relocation Site Office and E -3 Rehabili- <br />n Office areas will have to be cleared and a decision <br />d be made on how to rehouse the staff. <br />- 10 - <br />SITE OFFICE QUARTERS <br />