RM 11-03-72 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

0 ROYAL OF CLAIMS (Cont' URBAN REDEVELOPMENT FUND William R. Morris Agency, Inc. Erne t Escabeda Clar nce Hayden - Paid to Housing Authority Total GRAND TOTAL 4. OMMUNICATIONS a. HUD letter dated October 16, 1972: This letter over the signature of Mr. Stephen J. Havens, Director, Oper tions Division, states their office has received the imendatory applications for Projects Ind. E -3 and Ind. E -5, and as there are no allocations for code enforce- ment programs, the code projects will receive a "time only" amen atory, and the binders for the amendatories were re- turn d. The rojected close -out date for both projects was re- quested. Letters for the time extension were submitted by o r office in correspondence dated October 23 and 27, 1972 Moti n was made by Mr. Wiggins the letter be accepted and plac d on file, seconded by Mr. Chenney and unanimously carr ed. $ 25.00 200.00 85.00 310.00 $ 185,832.90 CODE PROJECTS TO RECEIVE "TIME ONLY" AMENDATORY, E -3 & E -5 HUD letter dated October 30, 1972: This letter EXECUTED FIRST over the signature of Mr. Keith W. Lerch, Attorney Advisor, AMENDMENT TO CONTRACT returned the fully- executed counterpart of the first amend- IND. E -3(G) ment to Contract Ind. E -3(G). Mr. Taylor advised that this is the executed Amendatory for Pudget No. 3, dated June 2, 1972, approved by HUD July 12, 1972. Moti n was made by Rev. Williams the letter be accepted and laced on file, seconded by Mr. Chenney and unani- mous y carried. c. HUD letter dated October 30, 1972: This letter over the signature of Mr. Keith W. Lerch, Attorney Advisor, returned the fully- executed counterpart of the first amend- ment to Contract Ind. E -5(G). This ject Moti and mous is the same as the above, only covering the E -5 Pro- )n was made by Rev. Williams the letter be accepted (laced on file, seconded by Mr. Chenney and unani- ly carried. - 5 - EXECUTED FIRST AMENDMENT TO CONTRACT IND. E -5(G)