My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SM 10-04-71
sbend
>
Public
>
Redevelopment Commission
>
Minutes
>
1970-1979
>
1971
>
SM 10-04-71
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/6/2012 10:41:46 AM
Creation date
9/11/2012 3:53:05 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
6. NEW BUSINESS (Cont'd <br />Pres <br />tena <br />same <br />tenai <br />are <br />to q, <br />noti <br />the <br />with <br />we b <br />cond <br />Mr. <br />Mr. i <br />surv( <br />area <br />cadet <br />esti n <br />$8,0( <br />ti oni <br />Miss <br />prove <br />to at <br />dent Helmen asked if the staff -is sure the other, <br />is wouldn't want to getout, being afraid the <br />thing may happen to them? Approximately 15 <br />is occupy the building. •Some of the tenants <br />o leave the first -of the•month and -still have no place. <br />Mr. Wiggins said -part of the building has al <br />collapsed; consequently, we are on <br />e to some'!extent of the building's weakness and <br />resence of the hazard. If we should go ahead <br />what is proposed and -more would collapse, would <br />held liable and are we permitting a dangerous <br />tion to continue? <br />labaugh advised this particular activity was caused <br />en digging next to the foundation: <br />shenfelter said police have been hired for <br />illance during evening hours. The collapsed. <br />is dangerous. The bottom floor must b.e barri <br />, which will eli- minate weather exposure. The <br />ate for the demolition will be•approximately <br />D to $10,000, and the barricades will be addi- <br />1 -- probably total estimate cost of $10,000. <br />Margaret White, HUD representative, has ap- <br />d this as an emergency measure, as an addendum <br />existing contract with the successful bidder. <br />-7- <br />by telephone <br />Change Order No. 5 to Contract 1 for Phase 1 -A: <br />CHANGE ORDER NO. 5 <br />Commission <br />had approved Change Order No. 1, in the a- <br />TO CONTRACT 1 FOR <br />mount <br />of $2,780.05, increase-to the original contract. <br />PHASE 1 -A APPROVED, <br />The amount <br />was adjusted -by removing same from demoli- <br />R -66 <br />tion <br />and site clearance Contract. No. 15. <br />This <br />Change Order No. 5 is to cover an additional <br />amou <br />t of $287.73 for work performed which had been <br />authorized <br />in Change Order No. 1, .(demolition of South <br />Carr <br />ll Street, from Station 1,7 +30 to Station 19+80). <br />On m <br />tion by Rev. Williams, seconded by Mr. Chenney, <br />Chance <br />Order No. 5 to Contract l for Phase l -A was <br />authorized <br />in the amount of $287.73, increase in <br />con tact <br />price, with no change in time. Motion unani- <br />mously <br />carried! <br />. Demolition Contract No. 19: Mr. Ashenfelter <br />DEMOLITION CONTRACT NO. <br />advised <br />part of the Columbia Storage and Warehouse, <br />19 AUTHORIZED, PARCEL <br />located <br />at 406 ''South Columbia.Street, Parcel-26-1, <br />26 -1, R -66 <br />cavec <br />in. Fortunately no lives were lost. Commission <br />auth <br />rization was requested to demolish about 30 feet <br />(TO-BE DESIGNATED AS <br />of t <br />e South wall of the building in order to take <br />AN ADDENDUM TO EXIST - <br />away <br />any hazard to the contractors working in the <br />ING CONTRACT WITH <br />stre <br />t. <br />SUCCESSFUL BIDDER) <br />Pres <br />tena <br />same <br />tenai <br />are <br />to q, <br />noti <br />the <br />with <br />we b <br />cond <br />Mr. <br />Mr. i <br />surv( <br />area <br />cadet <br />esti n <br />$8,0( <br />ti oni <br />Miss <br />prove <br />to at <br />dent Helmen asked if the staff -is sure the other, <br />is wouldn't want to getout, being afraid the <br />thing may happen to them? Approximately 15 <br />is occupy the building. •Some of the tenants <br />o leave the first -of the•month and -still have no place. <br />Mr. Wiggins said -part of the building has al <br />collapsed; consequently, we are on <br />e to some'!extent of the building's weakness and <br />resence of the hazard. If we should go ahead <br />what is proposed and -more would collapse, would <br />held liable and are we permitting a dangerous <br />tion to continue? <br />labaugh advised this particular activity was caused <br />en digging next to the foundation: <br />shenfelter said police have been hired for <br />illance during evening hours. The collapsed. <br />is dangerous. The bottom floor must b.e barri <br />, which will eli- minate weather exposure. The <br />ate for the demolition will be•approximately <br />D to $10,000, and the barricades will be addi- <br />1 -- probably total estimate cost of $10,000. <br />Margaret White, HUD representative, has ap- <br />d this as an emergency measure, as an addendum <br />existing contract with the successful bidder. <br />-7- <br />by telephone <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.