My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SM 10-04-71
sbend
>
Public
>
Redevelopment Commission
>
Minutes
>
1970-1979
>
1971
>
SM 10-04-71
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/6/2012 10:41:46 AM
Creation date
9/11/2012 3:53:05 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
5. OID BUSINESS (Cont_'d) <br />date ind cautioned against the many problems that <br />will irise until the Mall is in operation. They are <br />willi g to serve as consultants on a. .per diem basis. <br />again t a retainer. .Also urged. local real tors. be <br />invol ed in the'devel-opment and leasing of'small'er.'` <br />prope ties. <br />They submitted a copy of.their.pro.posal made to Michigan City <br />on their redevelopment project: <br />These letters are a result of our request to them. <br />V <br />Jf� <br />6. N W BUSINESS <br />a Contract 1 to:P.h.ase II =B: '*Authorization_. -was ADVERTISING AUTHORIZED <br />requested to advertise -:for Contract l to Phase II -B FOR CONTRACT 1 TO <br />forte construction'of new St. Joseph; Street _and'the ` PHASE II -B, R -66 <br />renovation of Colfax Bridge, R -66 Project. <br />Mr. S abaugh advised- Clyde -E. Williams.& Associates, <br />our f gineering', consultants, recommend the Colfax <br />Bridgc and the construction of the street be a part <br />Of thE same contract. Howell Construction Co. has <br />the c ntract for the'ret_aining wall If the bridge <br />and r taining wall were separate in'the contract; <br />there might be appreciable savings in time and <br />money, This will have to be handled by.addendum- <br />later. Same over -all bi.d. <br />Mr. A henfelter''advised the St. Joseph Street will be <br />broug t up to the Colfax,Avenue level. The l.ast two <br />bays c n the Colfax B ridge are to be acted upon. <br />On mo ion by Mr. Wi ggin:$, seconded 'by ' Mr.: Chesney, ` the <br />adver ising for! Contract j to Phase;II4 , as specified <br />above with an alternate for the division of the project <br />into two areas,',was approved. Motion unanimously <br />carri- d <br />ADVERTISING AUTHORIZED <br />FOR CONTRACT 1 TO .` <br />PHASE II -D, R -66 <br />b Contract 1 to :Phase IL!-D.: -This . item relates <br />to si. na ization discussed above''under "COMMUNICATIONS; <br />4a.° <br />Autho ization was requested to.`.advertis.e for entire. <br />signs ization for R -66, Contra-6i-1 to Phase II -D. Said <br />motior was made by Mr. Wiggins, seconded by Rev. Williams <br />and unanimously carried. <br />ff-11 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.