My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SM 10-04-71
sbend
>
Public
>
Redevelopment Commission
>
Minutes
>
1970-1979
>
1971
>
SM 10-04-71
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/6/2012 10:41:46 AM
Creation date
9/11/2012 3:53:05 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
4. COMMUNICATIONS (Cont'd) <br />b Toth & Toth Associates Letter Da- ted.Sept. -29, STORM SEWERS, PHASE I, <br />1971: Mr. Andrew A. Toth requested the source for R -66 <br />the authority and approval of the`Conceived -and now <br />constructed collective storm runoff for-discharge-from <br />the South Bend Downtown Renewal Area into the St. Joseph, <br />River <br />President Helmen advised this has been'taken care of <br />by our engineer's Clyde E. Williams & Associates, who <br />have een directed to give Toth & Toth Associates. <br />letters of authority from the-Indiana Agencies relative <br />to storm sewers'. <br />Mr. S abaugh advised Mr. Jaime Peredo, Consultant from <br />C1yde'E. Williams & Associates, Indianapolis, sent a <br />letter under date of September 29, 1971, to.-the Indiana - <br />Strea Pollution Control Board, submitting the pertinent <br />plans for the storm sewer : portion -of the work for their <br />approval 9 Phase I_, R -66. <br />Mr. A henfelter, advised on December 22,•1967; -the pre <br />limin ry proposed sewer improvements were submitted to <br />the S ream Pollution Control Board, and that Clyde E. <br />Willi ms will have gone through .the proper procedures. <br />We ar now awaiting approval of the final plans sub- <br />Or <br />tte . <br />President Helmen directed , that -Toth- &`Toth Associates <br />receive whatever documents we have to substantiate <br />our actions. <br />Mrs. anet S. Allen said that.in -the -paving -of our <br />stree s and sidewalks we are cutting down onthe- water <br />in th East Section.. In using dry. wells, the drainage <br />of th water would go back and-filter - into the ground, <br />inste d of into the river. If the trees do not-get <br />suffi Tent water, they will have to be: constantly re- <br />placel. <br />She s ggested instead of having storm. sewers- in the <br />streets that we place in dry wel-l.s for sewerage. Mr. <br />Slaba gh advised this would place the water level <br />neare the surface and this,water would have to be <br />drain d off. Our City Engineer,believes dry wells <br />would be prohibitive in cost and not feasible. <br />5. OLD BUSINESS <br />a <br />& Oct <br />Autho <br />Arthur'Rubloff & Co. Letters Dated Sept. 23 ARTHUR RUBLOFF & CO. <br />1, 1.971:' They commended the Redevelopment REAL ESTATE DEVELOPERS <br />ty on their Master Plan and acquisitions to <br />-5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.