Laserfiche WebLink
6. NEW BUSINESS (Cont'd <br />g. <br />zation <br />Option <br />vacant <br />Option Agreement R -57: Approval and authori- ONE (1) OPTION AGREE - <br />was requested for the President to sign One Cl) MENT APPROVED, PARCEL <br />Agreement, for Parcel No. 3923, which is a NO. 39 -23, LASALLE <br />lot on Kentucky Street. PARK URBAN RENEWAL <br />PROJECT, R -57 <br />Mr. Parrish advised this is substandard soil, and not <br />considered buildable land. It is to be used for en- <br />larging adjoining property. <br />On motion by Mr. Wiggins, seconded by Mr. Helmen, the <br />Option Agreement for the above- listed parcel was ap- <br />proved and unanimously carried. <br />h. <br />zation <br />Option <br />Projecl <br />Option Agreements, R -66 Approval and authort- <br />was requested for the President to sign three (3) <br />Agreements, in the Central Downtown Urban Renewal <br />R -66: <br />Parcel No. Address <br />9 -9 126 W. Washington Street <br />18 -6 320 S. Carroll Street (Vacant Lot) <br />20 -6 320 S. Michigan Street <br />On motion by Mr. Wiggins, seconded by Rev. Williams, the <br />Option Agreements for the above - listed parcels were ap- <br />proved and unanimously carried. <br />i. Resolution No. 326: This Resolution establishes <br />the recommended minimum disposition.price and fair market <br />value for land in the LaSalle Park Project, R -57. FHA <br />had wi hhei'd approval on processing, all'the land for fear <br />of flooding the market.: They now agree to their release, <br />Motion for the adoption of Resolution No. 326 was made <br />by Mr. Wiggins, seconded by Rev. Williams and unanimously <br />carrieq. <br />j. Resolution No. .327: This Resolution authorizes <br />the ex cution of the Redevelopment Agreement for the <br />dispos tion of land and the execution of Warranty Deeds <br />for th transfer of title, re George Cimermancic & <br />Associ tes proposals to redevelop the following parcels: <br />This hz <br />of Oct( <br />5 -6, 8 -23 and 8 -24, South 60' of 12 -15, 12 -30 <br />and 12 -31, 16 -7, 16 -8, 16 -9, 16 -10 and 16 -11 <br />17 -22, 17 -6 and 17 -7, 18;6 South 60'., 181.5_.and <br />18 -16, 22 -16 and 22-17,.:28-23, 29-1, 30 -27 and <br />30 -28. <br />s been discussed previously in'Commission meeting <br />ber 2, 1970 and everything is satisfactory. <br />On motion by Mr. Chenney, seconded by Mr. Wiggins, Resolu- <br />tion N 327 was adopted and unanimously carried, <br />-8- <br />THREE (3) OPTION AGREE - <br />MENTS APPROVED, PARCEL <br />NO,S. 9 -9, 18 -6 & 20 -6, <br />CENTRAL DOWNTOWN URBAN <br />REkEWAL PROJECT, R -66 <br />RESOLUTION NO. 326 <br />APPROVED, LASALLE PARK <br />URBAN RENEWAL PROJECT, R -57 <br />RESOLUTIONt NO: 327 <br />APPROVED, GEORGE CIMERMANCI <br />&:ASSOCIATES; LASALLE PARK <br />URBAN RENEWAL PROJECT, R -57 <br />