My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
RM 10-02-70
sbend
>
Public
>
Redevelopment Commission
>
Minutes
>
1970-1979
>
1970
>
RM 10-02-70
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/6/2012 1:27:20 PM
Creation date
9/10/2012 4:15:11 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
3. APP OVAL OF CLAIMS (Cont'd) <br />L. . Hawkin's Plumbing & Supply Co. $ 10.00 <br />Mar Publication Co. 2.82 <br />Rom Hammes, Inc. 12.53 <br />Seer er Safe & Locksmith Service 3.50 <br />She han Service Center 36.00 <br />Wei berger Bros. 19.90 <br />Xer x Corporation 213.55 <br />Total 10,064.70 <br />URBAN REDEVELOPMENT FUND <br />The Housing Authority <br />Doyle Peppers - Paid to Ebony Movers <br />Don a Braylock - Paid to Ebony Movers <br />Jua ita Richardson - Paid to Ebony.Movers <br />Gra ville W. Ziegler - Postmaster <br />Total <br />GRAND TOTAL <br />4. COM14UNICATIONS <br />a. Inwood's Store, Inc., letter dated September 24, <br />1970: This firm is concerned with Redevelopment taking <br />away 1/ of their parking lot and making a street out of <br />their a ley. <br />Preside it Wilhelm advised we will be taking 26 feet off <br />the Wes side of Inwood's alley at the rear. There will <br />be no o -street parking along Michigan Street to permit <br />free ac ess to the post office and the mall. <br />Mr. Wig ins suggested it would be well to advse'Inwoodts <br />that in every instance, where possible, a 40 -foot alley <br />is part of the plan and cannot be changed. Also, that <br />the 40- oot alley will not carry vehicular traffic, but <br />will be confined to delivery traffic. The alley will <br />create o further hazard, but will allow more room. <br />Presideiit Wilhelm said he is in favor of advising In- <br />wood's tie have to go ahead and cannot deviate from our <br />over-all plan. <br />$ 50.00 <br />130.00 <br />120.00 <br />108.00 <br />38`..00 <br />446.00 <br />$ 53,294.73 <br />INWOOD tS STORE, INC. <br />PARKING LOT AND ALLEY, <br />CENTRAL DOWNTOWN URBAN <br />RENEWAL PROJECT, R -66 <br />b. <br />Inwood's <br />Store, Inc., letter dated September 28, <br />TNWOOD'S,ST.ORE, INC. <br />1970: <br />Inwood's <br />also owns the building imme_ iately <br />REHAB 4223 SOUTH MICRIQAN1 <br />north of <br />their main building, at 423 South Michigan <br />CENTRAL DOWNTOWN 'URBAN <br />Street, <br />known as <br />Inwood's Gift Annex. They are request- <br />RENEWAL PROJECT, R -66 <br />ing information <br />as to what might be required' were they <br />to rehabilitate <br />this building and thus remove from our <br />list of <br />acquisitions. <br />M10 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.