My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
RM 07-18-68
sbend
>
Public
>
Redevelopment Commission
>
Minutes
>
1960-1969
>
1968
>
RM 07-18-68
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/6/2012 2:06:17 PM
Creation date
9/7/2012 3:01:31 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
been demons rated by various stores within the community by their <br />donation of equipment and/or clothing for this program. Letters <br />of commends ion and appreciation will be sent to each of the <br />stores cont ibuting, namely Goldblatt's, Robertson's and Sears. <br />b. Ind <br />strial Expansion Project R -56. Options on property <br />INDUSTRIAL EXPAN- <br />are now ei <br />g taken by the staff. A meeting was held with the <br />SION PROTECT, R -56 <br />project residents <br />and appropriate staff members, and it is grati- <br />fying to re <br />ort the residents' attitude is very receptive and <br />cooperative <br />to the project plans. About 80% of the residents <br />were in att <br />ndance, and the staff's responsibilities were ex- <br />plained in <br />onnection with the relocation process and assistance. <br />Mr. Scott p <br />inted out that in talking with the elderly of the <br />project are <br />, residence has been established perhaps up to 25 <br />years there <br />)y creating different kinds of relocation problems <br />but not imp <br />ssible ones. <br />c. Cen <br />ral Downtown Project, R -66. It is the staff's under- <br />CENTRAL DOWNTOWN <br />standing th <br />t the federal review of the Project Application is in <br />PROJECT, R -66 <br />the final w <br />ap -up stage. The staff has sent the top official of <br />HUD, Mr. Fisher, <br />a letter indicating the urgency for approval <br />which South <br />Bend feels, and also a letter to Congressman Brademas <br />seeking spe <br />ial assistance in this matter. <br />d. Citizens <br />for Continuing Central High School. Two repre - <br />CITIZENS FOR <br />sentatives <br />f this committee approached the Commission on the <br />CONTINUING CENTRAL <br />possibility <br />of including Central School as a part of the Phase I <br />HIGH SCHOOL <br />of the Downtown <br />Project. The Commission responded by stating <br />that no sch <br />of facility has been included in the planning for the <br />first phase <br />of the Central Downtown Project, nor would it be <br />passible to <br />change the plans. It was also asked of the Commis- <br />sion if there <br />would be any future plans for developing an inner <br />city school <br />complex to go along with urban development. A lengthy <br />discussion <br />Dursued but it was pointed out that all future plans <br />would be male <br />in accordance with demonstrated needs and the suc- <br />cess of the <br />first phase of the Downtown Project. At present, <br />plans call <br />or the development of mostly high rise apartments and <br />would not a <br />d significantly to school enrollments. It was ex- <br />plained tha <br />this Commission does not initiate urban renewal pro- <br />jects. The <br />a decisions are made by appropriate city officials <br />and committ <br />es with supporting studies to indicate the need for <br />such a proj <br />ct. Mrs. Curtis spoke on the new concept of total <br />planning fo <br />a city wherein appropriate city officials plan to- <br />gether and <br />incorporate all the needs of the city into the program. <br />Mr. Belling <br />r indicated that this is what the Area Plan Commission <br />is accompli <br />hing in completing the city and area wide Comprehen- <br />sive Plan. <br />5_ <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.