Laserfiche WebLink
P <br />s <br />a contr <br />upon th <br />The Con <br />A t ime <br />sewer 1 <br />possibi <br />►ct with Charles W. Cole and Son of.South Bend, <br />a motion by Mr. Helmen, seconded by Mr. Koczan. <br />tract to consider the following provisions: (1) . <br />Limit be set for the design of streets, water and <br />Lnes, perhaps up to six months, and (2) the, <br />Lity of a liquidated damages clause. <br />c. The Redevelopment Department has studied the <br />feasibility of installation of new accounting procedures <br />whereby appropriated city funds which were set aside <br />for urban renewal would be more.fully: utilized for that <br />purpose. The Commission approved the motion made by <br />Mr. Lo is, and seconded by Mr. Helmen, that Mr.. Glenn <br />Barbe be sent to Indianapolis on. Friday, June 3, 1966, <br />to review and discuss the proposed accounting system <br />with the State Board of Accounts. If concurrencd is <br />received from both the Common Council of South Bend <br />and the State Board of Accounts, the accounting system <br />will be initiated °as of July 1, 1966. <br />Mr. Wi gins asked for a report on the rent supplement <br />program. There has -been some money appropriated for <br />this p ogram, but applications are considered almost on <br />individual cases. The South Bend Redevelopment Department <br />will apply for application and deliberate at a later. <br />,INDIANAPOLIS TRIP <br />APPROVED FOR MR. <br />BARBS. <br />RENT SUPPLEMENTATION <br />PROGRAM REPORT <br />date when <br />it is available to South Bend. <br />Mr. Strickler <br />asked where the 80 acquisition appraisal <br />LOCATION OF 80 <br />parcels <br />were located in the LaSalle Park Project which <br />APPRAISED PARCELS, <br />were approved <br />today? Generally the lots are concentrated <br />R -57 <br />in the <br />central area but othe- rs•were.picked.from the <br />standpoint <br />of urgency. <br />A leng <br />by discussion was held on the Engineering Contract <br />R -57 ENGINEERING <br />to be <br />warded to Charles Wv Cole and Son for the LaSalle <br />CONTRACT DISCUSSION <br />Park P <br />oject, R -57. The amount of the contract cannot be <br />determ <br />ned but will be paid primarily on the basis of <br />conttr <br />ction costs. The range should be between $65,000 <br />to $75,000, <br />and the completion date of the engineering <br />contract <br />services is estimated to be four years dated <br />from March, <br />1966, because of disposition tract surveys. <br />In the <br />the pu <br />discussion on the Sample Street Project, R -7, <br />chaser of the last parcel of land cannot be di-s- <br />SAMPLE STREET <br />PROJECT, R -7 <br />P10 <br />closed <br />until the closing date, June 1, 1966. The press <br />will be <br />informed at that time. Mr. Helmen. asked for. the. <br />before <br />and after tax assessments in relation to urban' <br />v <br />renewal. <br />The taxes come to approximately 1.7 times as <br />W <br />much on <br />real estate than it was prior to acquisition. <br />LI! <br />Or <br />-3- <br />0 <br />