My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
RM 04-04-68
sbend
>
Public
>
Redevelopment Commission
>
Minutes
>
1960-1969
>
1968
>
RM 04-04-68
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/6/2012 2:07:33 PM
Creation date
9/6/2012 3:14:40 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
the submi tal to HUD Chicago, Form HUD-6144, Request for <br />Concurren e in Acquisition Prices, for Parcel 40-8, in the <br />LaSalle P rk Project, R-57. <br />b. Having <br />reviewed the site plans for the proposed <br />COMMISSION REJEC- <br />construction <br />of a porta-bank at the corner of Chapin and <br />TION OF PROPOSED <br />Sample Streets, <br />Parcel 2(a), Sample-Street Project, R-7, <br />PLANS FOR PORTA- <br />the staff <br />along with the Area Plan Commission recommends <br />BANK, PARCEL 2(a), <br />rejection <br />of this proposal primarily because of traffic <br />SAMPLE ST., R-7 <br />circulation. <br />This planned use would be a major traffic <br />TWO OPTION AGREE- <br />generator <br />and the curb cuts would create major traffic <br />Parcels 37-1 and 43-3, in the LaSalle <br />conflicts <br />thus seriously reducing-the capacity of the in- <br />R-57, <br />tersection <br />and at the same time creating a serious traffic <br />Mr. Helmen. <br />hazard. 1he <br />Commission concurred in this recommendation <br />that as the <br />bank construction is currently proposed'the <br />plans are <br />rejected, on motion by Mr. Chenney, seconded by <br />Rev. Kirk.1 <br />c. Two <br />rehabilitation grants received Commission <br />TWO REHAB. GRANTS, <br />approval, on <br />motion <br />by Mr. Helmen, seconded by Rev. Kirk, <br />LASALLE PARK, R-57 <br />and are for <br />Parcels <br />36-8 and 44-25 in the LaSalle Park <br />Project, R-57. <br />d. The <br />Commission approved the execution of two op- <br />TWO OPTION AGREE- <br />tion agreements <br />for <br />Parcels 37-1 and 43-3, in the LaSalle <br />MENTS, LASALLE <br />Park Project, <br />R-57, <br />upon motion by Mr. Chenney, seconded by <br />PARK R-57 <br />Mr. Helmen. <br />e. Resolution 215 received Commission approval, and RESOLUTION 215, <br />is a declaratory resolution approving the urban renewal CENTRAL DOWNTOWN <br />plan, and also the relocation plan which includes approxi- PROJECT, R-66 <br />mately 6 basinesses that will require in excess of $25,000 <br />for relocation expenses in connection with the Central <br />Downtown Project, R-66. The federal government will repay <br />two-thirds of the relocation expenditures in excess of this <br />amount, $25,000, and therefore, on motion by Mr. Helmen, <br />seconded by Mr. Chenney the resolution ' is approved along <br />with this olicy to consider each relocation claim individually. <br />7. PROGRESS <br />a. Chapin Street Project, R-29. The overpass construe-CHAPIN STREET <br />Lion has b2gun, and within the next few days the street PROJECT, R-29 <br />work will 2ommence. It is hoped the site improvement work <br />in this pr jest will be completed within three months. <br />b. La:')alle Park Project, R-57. The Amendatory LASALLE PARK <br />Applicatio.-i for Loan and Grant is in Washington now and PROJECT, R-57 <br />approval i3 expected within a week or two. Once the <br />Amendatory is under contract this phase of the project <br />can be completed rapidly. Mr. Scott reported that reloca- <br />tion resou?ces are urgently needed and the staff continues <br />to meet wi:h the Greater South Bend Housing Corporation and <br />the Housin), Authority as an indication of our willingness <br />i <br />:7 y <br />to coopera--e n any way possible to activate housing con- <br />-4- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.