Laserfiche WebLink
Performance <br />Services <br />added to the building, air-conditioning of areas that were previously not air-conditioned and other <br />identified adjustments shall be added to Base Year energy costs. <br />Performance Services does not utilize computer modeling to determine savings potential or a facilities <br />baseline consumption usage as we find that the program is only as good as the assumptions made and <br />the data entered. Instead, we use actual utility bills given to us by our customer to determine the <br />baseline utility consumption. This gives a more accurate picture of what the facility is using. <br />Performance Services intends to maximize the energy savings for your project primarily through careful <br />consideration for the design of your solar facilities. We aim to deliver superior financial performance of your <br />systems by developing designs that balance upfront costs with efficient and effective power generation. <br />Below is a list of some of the items we evaluate to maximize value and energy savings for our customers: <br />• Site location (distance to switchgear, shading, and topography considerations) <br />• Panel selection (wattage, efficiency and cost considerations) <br />• Inverter selection (size, stringing and cost considerations) <br />• Panel angle (row spacing and production ratio considerations) <br />• System commissioning for optimal performance <br />• LED and other building efficiency impacts on kWh reduction and solar design <br />Performance Services uses International Performance Measurement and Verification Protocol (IPMVP) <br />for all our guarantees. Unlike other providers that only use Option C, The Whole Facility Method, <br />Performance Services utilizes methods designed specifically for the improvement item selected. For <br />example, according to the IPMVP manual, Option A is most effective for lighting retrofits. Option B is <br />used for replacement of equipment that utilizes electricity and Option C (Whole Building) is excellent for <br />gas energy savings i.e. comparing gas bills of the base year to gas bills of the post -retrofit period. <br />The selection of the most optimal and cost-effective methodology for performance assurance will <br />depend on the improvements selected by the City of South Bend. As part of the contract development <br />process, Performance Services will work with the City to specify the exact monitoring necessary of <br />program improvements and costs for each improvement option, including which should be stipulated <br />because the cost of M & V outweighs the obvious calculated savings, Le, switching to LED lights gives an <br />obvious reduction in kW usage that can be easily calculated. The sum of these will be used as the basis <br />of the performance guarantee. For your project, we would recommend Option A which involves a one- <br />time measurement of solar output. <br />c. Provide a Measurement and Verification Plan and Annual Savings Report from a recent project. <br />Please find a measurement and verification plan and annual savings report from Delphi School <br />Corporation is shown on the next several pages. <br />Cunfidendal & Proprietary Document 11. Measurement & Verification - 2 <br />