|
575-
<br />Wednesday August 3rd., 1921. Coe.tinued
<br />30 Thatnone of said"real estate fs benefited or will be benefited
<br />by said improvement to.the extent'of the assessments;made against hhe same as set out
<br />in said assessment roll;
<br />4. That said lots will not be benefitted by the said improvement
<br />to..exceedt the following sum' against' each lot respectively:
<br />Lot No. ll, $225.00
<br />Lot No. 12; 225.00
<br />Lot No. 130 225.00
<br />Lot No..14, 225.00
<br />Lot No. 15 225.00
<br />Lot No.�16 225.00
<br />Lot No. 179 225,.00
<br />Lot No.18 225000
<br />Lot' Ne . 19 225.00 _
<br />LetNo. 20 225;00
<br />Lot No. 21 200.00 c:
<br />Lot No. 22 200.00
<br />Lot No. 23-250.00 °
<br />° Lot No. 24 250.00- °
<br />-Lot No. 25 250.00 °
<br />Lot No . 20 375.00.
<br />and any and all assessments against said lots for said improvement in any.amount.or
<br />amounts greater than said last named sums, are to such extent excessive in such sum as`tb
<br />they exceed said last°gamed amounts. '
<br />Wherefore said Charles Weidler remonstrates against each and
<br />all of the said asseswLeats as eontained is said assesE ent roll, and asks that this
<br />remonstrator and said real estate be releieved from the payment of any parts thereof in
<br />exceess of the said last named amounts against said respective lots.
<br />FILED CHARLFS WEIMER
<br />Aug. 3,19921. Remonstrator,
<br />BOARD OF PUBLIC WORKS
<br />BY G. A. ELLIOTT '
<br />President.
<br />° EWING AVENUE ,ASPHALTIC OONCRET£ ,PAVEMENT a
<br />wROVEmENT RESOLUTION No. 836.
<br />Before the Board of PUblie Works of the City of South Bend, State of Indiana.
<br />Remonstrance of St. Joseph Loan & Tvast Company,
<br />To Assessment rbll�
<br />To the Board of PUblic Works; °
<br />The undersigned remenstratorm. St. Joseph Loan and Trust
<br />Company repsectifal.ly•shows to the Board that it is the owner of the real estate
<br />hereinaher described in the City of South Bead, in the State of.Indiana:
<br />That said real estate has been assessed for.the i rovemeat
<br />th Ewi Avenue As haltic concrete av m t om ohigan Str at to ism
<br />rtMeta tie Cit �e im ®v e t Rg o u��e�i 8 or ou� � andado ust 'th , a e� r ton 9M w�e sai� ®ts en the a$ ivat o t o a sass ion 8
<br />aglixst said i s Are as V iows:
<br />Lo 1�5 iig Oak Park 4th Ad iitti®n,,ewn d St Jose
<br />pph
<br />&Trust Co pang ppaavemen 374 75 curb and ��uut�er 56.82 Anna' 6.51 totalJaMn
<br />.28• o##,, 1 4 in baK Park .Add ion owned-b St. Joseph Loan trust Co
<br />vement $&6 90• W-M in Oak P k �th. Addition,yowae g 5 Joseph �oan Trust
<br />o pavement28, curb jr.0 curb and butter I ! .48, grade 112. 2, total
<br />14g4 3( ; La 0 is Oak P rk 4th. 391-30,
<br />it on, owns bj St. es Lean & Trust 'om . ,
<br />pavement $38.4t.333,.eurb all gutter curb 3.00 grade P3 .95; Lot.33 in 0a Paft 4t4l
<br />Addition, owned by St. Joseph Loan & Trust Company, pavement $384:33, curb and gutter
<br />56,70, rode total $477.98; L t�q in Oak P rk44th. Additiion,ownsby St.1osephL6an &136.?51
<br />rusompany, pavement366:a3, curb 3.00, curb and. gutter48.60.
<br />rade $35.20p total $452.8 ; Lot 27 in Oak Park 4th. Addition owned by St.. Jeseh Loan
<br />Turst Company, pavement 455.23; Lot 22 is Oak Park 4th. Additon, owned by St._Joseph
<br />Lear & Turst Company, pavement $455.23• Lotn.21 in Oak'Park 4th. Addition, owned by St.
<br />Joseph Loan & Trust Company, pavement J481.73• Lot 18 in.Oak Park 4th. Additio, owned
<br />By St. Joseph Loan & Tuust Company, pavement #481.7 • Lot 15, in Osk Yark 4th Addition,
<br />owned by St. Joseph Loan & Trust Company,.pavement �207.89, curb $3.00 curb and gutter .
<br />$172.80, grade $116.14, total $1499.83.
<br />And said owned hereby remonstrates against the said
<br />assessments of -said real estate for the said improvement on the fallowing grounds,
<br />to-wit:-
<br />1. That all of the amounts so assessed against said lets or
<br />Parcels of lots are excessive:
<br />• 2. That said real estate° is not benefited and will not be
<br />benefited by said improvement in the amounts against the same as,above set out:-
<br />. 3. That said real estate will not be •ebezifited in any
<br />amount by 'said improvement, in exe'e_sst of the following:
<br />' Said lot 135, $250.009' said Let 134 $200.00; $aid Let 3
<br />$700.00.; said lot 33, $250.00; said Let 309$250.00;. said Lot 299 $225.00; said Lot 27
<br />4250.00;
<br />225,00; said Lot 25, $225.00; said Lot 22, $225.00; said lot 21, $250.0p; 4a d-Let 1% said Lot 15 $750.00
<br />Wherefore the paid owner remoae$ratea mid arsons=
<br />ments- in the amo;asrts"9tated, and set forth in the assessment r l i and asks t
<br />that said real estate and this remonstrator be re.leieved frogo'eo
<br />:! eri'
<br />exeep$ in the amounts hereinbef®re set, out as the sums by whjo;• dstate will be
<br />Y
<br />beneP$ ed. FILED f & TVV CO.
<br />AUG 1 -pi DL -GUY
<br />Board gt' fdblic WorksPrgsi4ea lliett
<br />Ito Attorneys.
<br />
|