Laserfiche WebLink
271 <br />Board met in regular session at 10: 00 A.M. All members present. <br />The Board contracted ,With Miller & Snake for three (3) curs of Indiana <br />Egg 6 X � inch. at '$6.25 per tan and as much more as is necessary forth* City Halls use, <br />subject however, to all government orders governing the coal situation and subject to any <br />change in the market supply. <br />Engineer filed estimated cost 8 Columbia Street Pipe sewer from Indiana <br />Avenue to 75 feet north of north line of Dubaii Avenue at . .. ....:..... $740.00 <br />.The following report filed by the Building Commissioner, read and <br />placed on file. <br />To the Honorable Board of Public Works, <br />South B-add, Indiana. <br />Gentlemen: - <br />Be. Your Honorable Board's Resolution 8-8-18, a copy of which, together with <br />c o z>y of notice served on the writer by V. C. Hastings, is hereto attached, I wish is <br />respectfully report as follows: - <br />I took full file . of all documents in. the case, properly <br />arranged lettered and indexed, to th City Attorney, to ascertain our, oxaet status <br />and powers in the matter, I had already made arrangements, which still stand, for labor, <br />to do the wreaking. <br />Mr. Slick informs me° that the sir ig ina l c and emnat ion not is a of 6-5-16 <br />is defective in that (1) it should have been served on all .owners and -the lessee, ,and was <br />only served on V. C. Hastings. (2) It does not order or .provide For° the vacation of the <br />condemned bui ding. (3) That V. C. Hastings cannot be considered agent or in control <br />of the premises. <br />It also appears -that said premises are not fully and adquately described <br />in said notice. <br />The preliminary Condemnat ion> loot ice being defect ivi, it follows tkat <br />all subsequent proceedings thereunder were equally so, and void except as to V. C. Hastings <br />ind iv idually as an owner. <br />I question the lesseeship of the H. L. Loehr Decorating Co._, as their <br />lease expired some time since. It was in force at the time of issuanee of notice. I would <br />at present consider them as tenants or occupants. <br />Mr. Slick told me that for reasons above stated, the wrecking of said <br />building, involving as it would the removal of certain property and stock of the H. L. <br />Loehr Decorating Co., Occupants, might invllve the City in suit by them for damages. <br />After. a tole hone discussion between Messrs Slick nd Hastings, the <br />former told me the latter informed him he would cause the H. L. Loehr Co. to vacate <br />forthwith, beginning to -day, and at once thereafter proceed with effective wrecking <br />operations himself. I have .the building under close observation, and if this is done, it <br />seems to me the main object will have been secured; i e., to get the danagerous building <br />down. <br />Should there be any delay, I am even now wr it ing a second c ondemnat ion <br />notice, and notice to vacate, correcting theeniginak defects, and will be ready to proceed <br />vigorously to completion should occasion rise. It is evident that proceedings under <br />or ignal notice can only involve us in further and perhaps worse difficulties. <br />It is insterest ing to note that I have carried to successful issue <br />two Other condemnations having -the sme defects as this,.made bfore my assuming charge <br />here. I shall at once look up and correct any I may find -in the office, and whatever mist& <br />occur, this one will not be repeated. I have been In error in trying to force this to a <br />issue. <br />I consider this case closed; howeverlithe case itself is by no means, <br />closed, and will probably develop itself this month. <br />Very respectfully, <br />W. D. TEEPLE <br />ACTING COMMA?. OF BLDGS.. <br />