|
under the development plan for the Area; and
<br />WHEREAS, a list has been prepared indicating that 267 parcels of
<br />property are proposed to be acquired within the Sample -Ewing
<br />Development Area at the present time; and
<br />WHEREAS, the estimated cost of acquisition and redevelopment in
<br />the Sample -Ewing Development Area is $25,200,000; and
<br />WHEREAS, there was presented to this meeting of the Commission,
<br />for its consideration and approval, a copy of the Development Plan for
<br />the Sample -Ewing Development Area, which plan is dated December 17,
<br />1993, and is entitled Sample -Ewing Development Area Development Plan,
<br />South Bend, Indiana, ( "Plan "); and
<br />WHEREAS, the conditions under which the Commission will make
<br />relocation payments previously has been reviewed and considered by the
<br />Commission and, by Resolution 978, adopted February 8, 1991, the
<br />Commission elected to follow the Uniform Relocation Assistance and
<br />Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970 (420 U.S.C. 4601 -4655)
<br />and, on May 10, 1991, approved and adopted the Department of
<br />Redevelopment Relocation Policy and the Department of Redevelopment
<br />Policy of Management of Acquired Property, to address relocation needs
<br />in all redevelopment areas, which would include the Sample -Ewing
<br />Development Area; and
<br />WHEREAS, the Development Plans for the Studebaker Corridor
<br />Development Area and the Rum Village Industrial Park all need to be
<br />amended, merged into, and superseded by the Plan; and
<br />WHEREAS, Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, and
<br />HUD regulations effectuating that title provide that no person shall,
<br />on the grounds of race, age, sex, color, or national origin, be
<br />excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits o €, or be
<br />subject to discrimination in the undertaking or carrying out of any
<br />federally assisted project; and
<br />WHEREAS, the Commission, by Resolution No. 650, adopted December
<br />18, 1981, confirmed by Resolution No. 654, adopted February 19, 1982,
<br />amended by Resolution 718, adopted October 12, 1984, confirmed by
<br />Resolution No. 722, adopted December 21, 1984, further amended by
<br />Resolution No. 783, adopted September 12, 1986, confirmed by
<br />Resolution No. 786, adopted October 10, 1986, further amended by
<br />Resolution No. 810, adopted August 28, 1987, confirmed by Resolution
<br />No. 817, adopted October 23, 1987, established the Rum Village
<br />Industrial Park Allocation Area (South Bend Allocation Area No. 4)
<br />with respect to the allocation of real and personal property taxes
<br />levied within the Rum Village Industrial Park (Expanded); and
<br />WHEREAS, the Commission, by Resolution No. 762, adopted January
<br />19, 1986, confirmed by Resolution No. 764 adopted February 14, 1986,
<br />and amended by Resolution No. 986, adopted April 12, 1991, established
<br />the Studebaker Corridor Allocation Area (South Bend Allocation Area
<br />No. 6) with respect to the allocation of real property taxes levied
<br />within the Studebaker Corridor Development Area (Expanded); and
<br />WHEREAS, the Commission, by Resolution No. 952, adopted July 27,
<br />1990, established the Rum Village Industrial Park. Enterprise Zone
<br />Fund; and
<br />WHEREAS, the Commission, by Resolution 953, adopted July 27, 1990,
<br />established the Studebaker Corridor Development Area Enterprise Zone
<br />Fund; and
<br />WHEREAS, the Department, having studied the same with respect to
<br />each taxing unit that is wholly or partly within the Sample -Ewing
<br />Allocation Area (South Bend Allocation Area No. 8), described at
<br />Paragraph 15, below, has prepared a statement disclosing the impact of
<br />the Sample -Ewing Allocation Area (South Bend Allocation Area No. 8)
<br />including: (A) The estimated economic benefits and costs incurred by
<br />the allocation area, as measured by increased employment and
<br />anticipated growth of real property assessed values, and (B) The
<br />anticipated impact on,tax revenues of each taxing unit.
<br />-11-
<br />
|