Laserfiche WebLink
PERFORMANCE BASED BUDGETING AND <br />OUTCOME MEASUREMENT <br />INTRODUCTION <br />The City of South Bend has an established and well-respected commitment to performance <br />Lased budgeting. This process attempts to hold departments and staff accountable for achieving <br />citywide goals and objectives by benchmarking their actual performance and by budgeting <br />accordingly. For the City, as for many other entities using performance based budgeting, <br />articulating long-range goals and objectives -the vision -has not been terribly difficult. What <br />has been difficult, however, has been itemizing and expressing real and meaningful measures of <br />performance. In the performance based budgets prepared by the City prior to 1999 there were no <br />standardized or utilitarian definitions of performance measures utilized by all departments. In <br />the absence of such standards or definitions, departments simply recorded and reported their <br />outputs, their production - certainly a measure of something, but not necessarily a measure of <br />their contributions to the realization of citywide goals and objectives. In order to enhance the <br />performance based budget, the City incorporated outcome measurement in the process which <br />utilizes formats called logic models. <br />Outcome measurement is a unique tool that is client-centered. It produces a clear, defined and <br />standardized set of indicators reflecting the impact or change that each program attempts to effect <br />among their clients or customers. It is a tool that provides a foundation for performance based <br />budgeting. It allows each City program's staff to identify the clients they serve, to describe the <br />changes they wish to make in those clients, and to associate those changes with citywide goals. It <br />allows decision-makers to evaluate programs three-dimensionally: first in terms of the outcomes <br />these programs say they will produce, second in terms of community wide goals and objectives, <br />and finally in terms of cost effectiveness. It is a tool that puts flesh on the performance based <br />budgeting skeleton. (Those wishing to read further about the tool should look at United Way of <br />America's Measuring Program Outcomes: A Practical Approach.) <br />Outcome measurement always begins with a defined mission, a clear and concise presentation of <br />the program`s purpose and intent. In the following pages you will find that each program has <br />written a purpose statement (program purpose) intended to focus the program's activities and <br />services in a manner consistent with the city`s mission statement -- "to become a model city." <br />The program's clients nr consumers have also been identified. Within the context of outcome <br />measurement, clients or consumers are simply those people who directly consume the services <br />provided by a program. <br />When reading this document, it is important to remember that clients or consumers maybe <br />distinct from beneficiaries. Beneficiaries are those larger populations who reap a return from the <br />investment made in programs but who do not necessarily consume the services of those <br />programs. To better illustrate this, consider the following example. As guards in a prison, the <br />staff manages the activities of the incarcerated population -- enforcing schedules, providing <br />recreational opportunities, making certain that prisoners have appropriate access to families and <br />C-1 <br />