Laserfiche WebLink
South Bend -Strategic Planning and Performance Measurement <br />During 1994 the City began a strategic planning process that included the development of long <br />term goals and objectives (both on a citywide and departmental level), the enhancement of <br />organizational communications (both internally and externally) and the development of a <br />framework for which to enhance the annual performance based budget process. It is not easy to <br />translate long term broad objectives into departmental work programs given the diversity of the <br />City's business units. It is also difficult to develop meaningful measures of performance that <br />help managers and the community determine how effective a given program truly is. This is an <br />ever evolving effort that will continue year after year. The City's mission is to be a model city. <br />That is a lofty goal, but it is attainable. The way this will be accomplished is through the <br />synergy that is created by people and teams working toward a common end. These teams do not <br />solely consist of the elected officials and the management levels of the organization, but also <br />include the people in the field or off ce who provide the day to day services. <br />Whenever strategic planning takes place, there are always many questions that are asked. How <br />do we fund a long list of important, costly capital needs without cutting or compromising the <br />critical daily services we currently provide? How can we more equitably spread the cost of City <br />services among those who receive their benefit? How do we continue to take the next step in <br />reaching our mission to be recognized as a model city? Those questions and more represent <br />some of the significant challenges facing this organization. It would be appropriate at this point <br />to discuss the concept that drives this document and, more important, the two key issues that are <br />always at the forefront: performance measurement and accountability to our customer. <br />The following comments are summarized from the municipal .year book as published by The <br />International City/County Management Association: <br />No management topic has received as much notoriety, as well as resources, from the public <br />sector in the last few years as Performance Measurement. If organizations don 't have a <br />measurement system in place, they are probably considering developing one. If they have one in <br />place, it is unlikely to shrink in importance or in the amount of management attention it <br />commands. Performance measurement in local government is here to stay. <br />Many local governments have demonstrated that implementation of a performance measurement <br />system is feasible and that, once in place, it serves as a valuable tool for improving the efficiency <br />and effectiveness of services and operations. <br />As public confidence and trust in local government has waned, satisfaction with government <br />service efficiency and effectiveness has diminished, as have available resources. As a result, <br />policy makers and managers have had to examine more closely the efficiency of their operations, <br />as well as demonstrate the value and impact of their services and programs. Performance <br />measures have become not only an important management tool but also a vehicle to inform <br />citizens about the use of their tax dollars. <br />This is the key to South Bend's commitment to the concept of performance based budgeting. <br />This letter has spoken to our mission of being recognized as a model city, as well as the key <br />issues facing our leaders. The fact is we cannot achieve our mission or overcome the long term <br />hurdles without making improvements in our delivery of day to day services. <br />viii <br />