My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08-25-06 Redevelopment Commission Minutes Minutes
sbend
>
Public
>
Redevelopment Commission
>
Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2006
>
08-25-06 Redevelopment Commission Minutes Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/13/2007 1:18:08 PM
Creation date
12/11/2007 4:51:00 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
Date
8/25/2006
Document Relationships
08-25-06 Agenda
(Superseded by)
Path:
\Public\Redevelopment Commission\Agendas & Packets\2006
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
73
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
South Bend Redevelopment Commission <br />Rescheduled Regular Meeting -August 25, 2006 <br />6. NEW BUSINESS (CONT.) <br />A. Public Hearing <br />() continued... <br />done. The Commission is not required to <br />have evidence or make findings that were <br />required for the establishment of the original <br />development area. However, the Commission <br />is required to make the following findings <br />before approving the amendment: (1) The <br />amendment is reasonable and appropriate <br />when considered in relation to the original <br />resolution, plan and purposes ofI.C. 36-7-14, <br />and (2) The resolution or plan, with the <br />proposed amendment, conforms to the <br />comprehensive plan for the City of South <br />Bend. Resolution No. 2254 includes this <br />language and accordingly, adoption by the <br />Commission would satisfy the requirements <br />of the statute. In addition, the Commission is <br />required to consider any written <br />remonstrances that are filed during the filing <br />period specified in the notice. The <br />Commission's action on a remonstrance is to <br />overrule or sustain the remonstrance. <br />Mr. King asked if the five communications <br />that Mr. Inks referred to are deemed to be <br />written remonstrances upon which the <br />Commission must act? Ms. Greene <br />responded that a remonstrance for <br />consideration by the Commission is a <br />communication that (1) is in writing, <br />(2) complies with the deadline imposed by <br />the notice, and (3) is in specific opposition to <br />the resolution that is before the Conunission. <br />Sometimes the Commission receives <br />comments from the public that the person <br />likes or does't like a particular project or an <br />aspect of a project, but such communication <br />8 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.