My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-04-04 Redevelopment Commission Minutes
sbend
>
Public
>
Redevelopment Commission
>
Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2004
>
06-04-04 Redevelopment Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/2/2012 12:13:26 PM
Creation date
7/21/2011 2:49:00 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
South Bend Redevelopment Commission <br />Regular Meeting —June 4, 2004 <br />ILI 6. NEW BUSINESS (CONT.) <br />D. Airport Economic Development Area <br />(1) continued... <br />permission to enter the property to begin <br />construction after execution of an <br />indemnification agreement <br />Ms. Greene advised that the property was <br />previously for sale and was not purchased; <br />therefore, the original offering price is no <br />longer an issue. Indiana Code 36- 7 -14 -22 <br />governs the disposition of property by the <br />Redevelopment Commission. The <br />Commission may adjust offering prices in a <br />manner that is considered necessary to <br />further the redevelopment plan or <br />development plan for the area. In <br />determining whether or not to sell a parcel <br />of property, the Redevelopment Commission <br />may consider any factors that will assure that <br />the disposition of property, if made, would <br />further the execution of the development <br />plan and best serve the interest of the <br />community from the standpoint of both <br />human and economic welfare. In this <br />particular case, it is precedent setting that <br />the Commission would be taking this action; <br />however, there is no recommendation nor <br />suggestion by staff that this action set a <br />precedent for future transactions. The <br />property has been sitting idle and has not <br />been generating taxes for the City and the <br />proposed transaction would restore the <br />property to the tax rolls. <br />Mr. Blake asked if there were any provisions <br />in the transaction for tax abatement. Mr. <br />Rock responded there was not. The building <br />was constructed previously. <br />IL 10 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.