Laserfiche WebLink
Redevelopment Commission Meeting <br />Regular Meeting — September 17, 2004 <br />6. NEW BUSINESS (CONT.) <br />A. Public Hearing <br />(1) continued... <br />2. The property you are seeking to take is <br />part of the total property being used by <br />Eckler -Lahey Lumber Company and <br />represents a 'piece-meal " taking of our <br />property which diminishes the value of the <br />total property which we own in the area. <br />Please consider this letter as a remonstrance <br />and objection to adding our property (Key <br />No. 18- 8006 -0338) to the List of Properties <br />to be Acquired. <br />Very truly yours, <br />Peter J. Nemeth <br />., Peter K Mullen <br />Ms. Greene noted that the amendment of a <br />redevelopment plan to add property to the <br />acquisition list is governed in part by I.C. 36- <br />7 -14 -17.5. The notice was published in <br />accordance with I.C. 5 -3 -1 stating the time <br />for hearing of written remonstrances. Under <br />I.C. 36 -7 -14 -17.5, when the Commission <br />proposes to amend a plan, it is not required to <br />have evidence or make findings that were <br />required when the Commission originally <br />established the development area. However, <br />the Commission must make the following <br />findings on the record before approving the <br />amendment: (1) That the amendment is <br />reasonable and appropriate when considered <br />in relation to the original plan and purposes <br />of the chapter and that the proposed <br />amendment does conform to the <br />redevelopment plan for the area. Those <br />findings are included in Resolution No. 2084. <br />G <br />