Laserfiche WebLink
Redevelopment Commission Meeting <br />(61V Regular Meeting — September 17, 2004 <br />6. NEW BUSINESS (CONT.) <br />A. Public Hearing <br />(1) continued... <br />If the Commission adopts Resolution No. <br />2084 it would be entering its findings <br />consistent with the statute. However, the <br />findings must be based upon the evidence <br />presented to the Commission today by staff. <br />Ms. Greene noted that the remonstrance from <br />Peter Mullen and Peter Nemeth raises two <br />primary objections: (1) The public purpose in <br />the Commission's proposed acquisition of <br />the property and (2) acquisition of the <br />property would result in a piece -meal taking <br />thereby diminishing the value of other <br />property adjacent thereto. <br />Ms. Greene further advised the Commission <br />that Mr. Laurent has indicated to the <br />Commission that the property is located in an <br />area declared blighted. Mr. Laurent further <br />reported to the Commission that acquisition <br />of the properties is consistent with and in <br />furtherance of the redevelopment plan for the <br />area. <br />Ms. Greene asked the Commission if they <br />had any questions for staff regarding the <br />public purpose or the use of the property. <br />Ms. Jones asked if the Mullen/Nemeth <br />property is the last of the properties to be <br />acquired for the industrial park. Mr. Laurent <br />responded that it is the last of six properties <br />to be acquired for the industrial park. <br />Ms. Jones asked if the properties to the east <br />and to the south are not being acquired. Mr. <br />10 <br />