My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10095-11 Amend Code Ch 17 Art. 2 Div. 1,3,4 and 6 EPA's Model Pretreatment Ordinance
sbend
>
Public
>
Common Council
>
Legislation
>
Ordinances
>
2011
>
10095-11 Amend Code Ch 17 Art. 2 Div. 1,3,4 and 6 EPA's Model Pretreatment Ordinance
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/17/2011 11:36:52 AM
Creation date
6/17/2011 10:51:29 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council - City Clerk
City Council - Document Type
Ordinances
City Counci - Date
6/13/2011
Ord-Res Number
10095-11
Bill Number
28-11
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
84
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
enforcement action against a User for a bypass, unless <br /> i. Bypass was unavoidable to prevent loss of life, personal <br /> iniury, or severe property dama�e; <br /> ii. There were no feasible alternatives to the bypass, such <br /> as the use of auxiliary treatment facilities, retention of <br /> untreated wastes or maintenance durin� normal periods of <br /> eQUipment downtime. This condition is not satisfied if <br /> adequate back-up ec�uipment should have been installed in <br /> the exercise of reasonable en in�g,_judgment to prevent <br /> a bypass which occurred durin� normal periods of <br /> equipment downtime or preventive maintenance; and; <br /> iii. The User submitted notices as required under <br /> foregoin� Subsection(3) of this section. <br /> � The Director ma�pprove an anticipated bypass, after <br /> considerin� its adverse effects, if the Director determines that it <br /> will meet the three conditions listed in para�ph (dl(1) of this <br /> Section 17-14. <br /> � Upset <br /> � For the purposes of this Section, upset means an exceptional <br /> incident in which there is unintentional and temporary noncompliance with <br /> cate�orical Pretreatment Standards because of factors bevond the <br /> reasonable control of the User. An upset does not include noncompliance <br /> to the extent caused by operational error, improperl�gned treatment <br /> facilities inadequate treatment facilities, lace of preventive maintenance, <br /> or careless or improper operation. <br /> � An u set shall constitute an affirmative defense to an action <br /> brou ht for noncompliance with cate�orical Pretreatment Standards if the <br /> requirements of para raph (c), below, are met. <br /> � A User who wishes to establish the affirmative defense of upset <br /> shall demonstrate, through properl�i�ned, contemporaneous operatin� <br /> lo�s, or other relevant evidence that: <br /> � An upset occurred and the User can identify the cause(sL <br /> the upset; <br /> 67 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.