03-27-06 Zoning & Annexation - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Council 11/lemher :deter voiced concern about the fiscal impact review regarding P©lice services. t-Ie noted that crzrrer~t Police feat 1 S is already stretched beyond. The residents in the area in the anne~.ati.on area would never see a police car. I Ie Doped that real answers instead of political answers would ~~e set forth. in the fiscal report. i-te noted. that that same forn~uia is used a~~d. sh®uld be modified in light of the reality of the situation. ate added that he has voiced similar concerns ia~ the past shout the north side of the city and police serviees. Cnt~~~cil Member i~irsits voted that a three and distance rule apparently is being cased ar~d they aa-e lust plugging in nu~n~sers. footh he and Council Menll~er Dieter suggested that the Council's health and 1?ublic safety C'oz~~n~ittee and. the Co~zncil's ,honing and Annexation Committee bold separate r.~~eetings to address this concern in greater detail. 1!/fr. €~4ariani stated that 17.e has noted their eoncerns. The C®uncil Attorney noted that this is the second tine that Council i~!lelnl~er Dieter has voicr;d a~.onct;rn regarding fiscal impact reports and their p~.~blic safety hnpact. the nc~tecl that state law rega~ires fiscal in~}~act~ statements in light of the city se~ie~es which. must he provided in a ti~.~ .ely manner as set forth by state law. ~'rrllo4vin~r discussi{Bra, Cou~~cil l~letnber Dieter made a motion, sec~anded ~~y. Council 1~4e~~iber white that 13111 l~los. €}6-2 7 and l~-O~a lie reeoin~~aended favc~rahly tee Cauncil. "~'he ~notio~~ passed. X3111 l~®< 1~-46: Conl'irmin~ the ~®t~n~ardes of't~e ~:ltv:_ Chief Assista~lt City Attor~~ey Aladea~~ t~el~€~se requested that Bill Na. 18-~Ei be ct~ntinued to tl~~; April l(}th Council meeting in order tc* allow addi.tianai tune to check data in light of GlS inforanatio~~. ~`ouncil Me~~nber ~Ihite made a:notion, seconded by Council. Member Dieter that 13111 moo. 18-06 be reco~nmc~ided to be cmntinued to April 10, ?f)C3Fi, at the request of the City Admii~istratiot~. The €~~otion passed. The Council Attorney noted that u~~der the -`Unfinished Business" section of tonight's Common Council meeting the appeal of the denial ol` a certificate of appropriateness ~'Vo. ~~0~-1f~2~}A by the I-listori~ Preservation Cnn~tassican addressing the gateho~,~se at ~3C3® portage Avenue is listed. The attorneys for all parties have requested that the appeal hu continued until April 27, ?Op€~. the recotnanended that Apri[ 19th at moon also be established as the deadline for the attorneys to file ~ne~norar~dun~s with the (~fce cif the; City Clem.. Nlr. Talley made a ~»otior€ to that eftec;t, seconded by Council Member ~Il~ite. The ~notio7t. passed. .l~here being no t~.~rther br€siness to wine before the C:o~ntnittee, Council Me~nl~ec• Kirsits adjourned the Cc~n~~nittee meeting at 3:47 p.~n. NEarci~ ~7" 2f)f1G ~.oning uad Aiine~attsm Ccxvmillce o~ thc?{~F)6 SouEh f3enc~ C'o~t'n~~on C'i~~f~~e€I -page 2 ~al~ :r-