My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-09-11 Council Agenda & Packet
sbend
>
Public
>
Common Council
>
Common Council Agenda Packets
>
2011
>
05-09-11 Council Agenda & Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/9/2011 3:49:06 PM
Creation date
5/5/2011 1:46:22 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council - City Clerk
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
261
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
A-n—ticil2ated chap e will be re fired to meet the <br />Mass or concentration limit in its exmit that were <br />based on the original estimate of the loncr term <br />average production rate. We currently provide our <br />production data to the City of South, Bend on a <br />monthly basis in the Monthly Industrial Wastewater <br />Discharge Report. The concern is having only 2 <br />days to report a change before it happens in the <br />next calendar month. Something as routine as a <br />week long maintenance outage can have a big impact <br />on monthly production. What is considered to be a <br />significant change? <br />3. Sec. 17 -10 (a)(1) - page 29, Users shall xovide <br />wastewater treatment as necessary to co m ly with <br />and the iorohihiti ons set out i.n Li Sectionul7_ .L LUZ5, <br />this Div sion within the time limitations sipecified <br />by EPA the State or the Director, whichever is <br />mnra cf- ,- ; ---- +. Tom__ <br />-- - - -- Q11U <br />maintained at the User's ex ease. Detailed jolans <br />review, and no construction of such faciliti .EC <br />es <br />necessary to produce a discharcre accg table to the <br />City Aunder the rovisions of this Division. A11 <br />facilit1 R.- 77PrACCart� � 7 : _._ �_ � _ <br />determine that such facilities are bein o grated <br />in conformity with a licable Federal State and <br />local law. The owner shall maintain o gratin <br />comparison against City monitorin-- records. 1Does <br />this mean written approval is required to modify or <br />improve facilities? The above language seems to <br />require approval before treatment facilities can be <br />modified or constructed and yet hold the discharger <br />accountable to insure that the discharge is <br />acceptable. The City should not be in °the position <br />of approving treatment systems unless they are <br />willing to accept the consequences of the failure <br />of the approved system to meet discharge <br />limitations. It is incumbent upon the discharger to <br />meet the permit limits and they should be allowed <br />to do whatever is necessary to do so. <br />Porinerships belween subsidfories of Atcelormatot and Nippon Steel Carparation <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.