My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-11-11 Council Agenda & Packet
sbend
>
Public
>
Common Council
>
Common Council Agenda Packets
>
2011
>
04-11-11 Council Agenda & Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/7/2011 11:14:49 AM
Creation date
4/7/2011 11:09:44 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council - City Clerk
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
90
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Substitute Bill No. 86-10 <br /> Ordinance No. <br /> AN ORDINANCE OF THE COMMON COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTH BEND, <br /> INDIANA,AMENDING CHAPTER 14.5 OF THE SOUTHBEAW MUNICIPAL CODE <br /> ADDRESSING MINORITY AND WOMEN BUSINESS ENTERPRISE DIVERSITY <br /> DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMS <br /> STATEMENT OF PURPOSE AND INTENT <br /> In 1987, the City Administration and the Common Council worked for months researching, <br /> discussing and hosting public meetings, and specifically sought input from the Mayor's Minority <br /> Affairs Council to develop local regulations addressing employment opportunities. 2nd District <br /> Council Member Eugenia Braboy sponsored a proposed ordinance which the Common Council <br /> passed in order to "address equal opportunity for minorities and women with regard to employment <br /> and bidding for City contracts". Those regulations became Ordinance No. 7811-87 and were <br /> codified into the South Bend Municipal Code as Article 1 of Chapter 14.5. <br /> In 1989, the United States Supreme Court held in a 6-3 decision in City of Richmond v. J.A. <br /> Croson Co., 488 U.S. 469 (1989) that state and local regulations which included preference would <br /> be subject to a "strict scrutiny standard".whereby a "compelling interest" must be shown and such <br /> standards must be "narrowly tailored"to address the overall purposes of the regulations. <br /> In 1995, the United States Supreme Court held in a 5-4 decision in Adarand Construction, <br /> Inc. v. Pena, 515 U.S. 200 (1995) that remedying past discrimination may in some circumstances <br /> constitute a "compelling interest" sufficient to justify race-based measures. The Court did not <br /> address the constitutionality of programs which are aimed at advancing non-remedial objectives <br /> such as promoting diversity and inclusion. <br /> Programs which provide opportunity for minority-owned and women-owned businesses who <br /> wish to participate in the governmental contracting process have been implemented in Evansville, <br /> Fort Wayne and Indianapolis. Research reveals that the State of Indiana's implementation of the <br /> Minority and Women's Business Enterprises (MBVE/WBE) Program, has a component where it is <br /> regularly reviewed and evaluated, with the focus being the effectiveness of their program with <br /> regard to state contracts. In the interest of improving overall participation and opportunities in <br /> South Bend and having regulations which are consistent with governing statutes and judicial <br /> opinions, the following ordinance is proposed to amend the 1987 regulations currently codified in <br /> the South Bend Municipal Code. The ordinance institutes local programs which are similar to <br /> others operating in the State of Indiana today. <br /> This ordinance is aimed to maximize participation and opportunities in South Bend by <br /> facilitating networking, outreach, communication, education, training, internal accountability and <br /> employment opportunities for qualified MBE and WBE. It is designed to be a pro-active, fair and a <br /> reasonable mechanism,which is believed to be reasonable, and in the best interest of our city. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.