My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11/10/1980 Board of Public Works Minutes
sbend
>
Public
>
Public Works
>
Minutes
>
1980
>
11/10/1980 Board of Public Works Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/24/2011 4:20:06 PM
Creation date
1/28/2011 12:06:05 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board of Public Works
Document Type
Minutes
Document Date
11/10/1980
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
REGULAR MEETING <br />NOVEMBER 10, 1980 <br />The regular meeting of the Board of Public Works was convened at <br />9:30 a.m. on Monday, November 10, 1980, by President Patrick M. <br />McMahon, with Mr. McMahon, Mr. Richard L. Hill and Mr. Joseph E. <br />Kernan present. Deputy City Attorney Terry A. Crone was also present. <br />MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETING APPROVED <br />Upon a motion made by Mr. Kernan, seconded by Mr. McMahon and <br />carried, the minutes of the regular meeting of November 3, 1980, <br />were approved as submitted. <br />PUBLIC HEARING - PHILLIPA STREET SANITARY SEWER PROJECT <br />Mr. McMahon stated that the Board had approved the final assessment <br />roll for the Phillipa Street Sanitary Sewer Project on March 10, <br />1980, after conducting public hearings on the project; however, at <br />that time, the residents had been advised that no billing under the <br />Barrett Law Program for the sewers would take place until all the <br />work was completed. He stated that this final public hearing was being <br />held in order to give the residents an opportunity to come before <br />the Board regarding the project prior to the assessment taking place. <br />It was noted that several meetings between the residents and the <br />Engineering Department had also taken place in the neighborhood <br />concerning the project. <br />Mr. Jack Young, 1713 South Phillipa Street, asked when the street <br />would be finished and the catch basins installed. Mr. McMahon <br />stated that the Bureau of Sanitation would be doing the work on the <br />catch basins at each intersection. Mr. John Leszczynski, City <br />Engineer, advised that the bureau would be starting on the catch <br />basin construction as soon as possible and that the work would hope- <br />fully be completed before the end of the year. Mr. Young then asked <br />about the sidewalk repair which had been done. He wondered why <br />those persons who owned vacant lots in the area had not had their <br />sidewalks replaced like some of the other residents who had homes <br />or buildings on the lots. Mr. Mcllahon stated that he had personally <br />looked at the damage which O'Neal Trucking Company had done to some <br />of the sidewalks in the area and O'Neal had been asked to repair <br />only that sidewalk which he had damaged at the tap locations. Mr. <br />McMahon stated that most of the sidewalk in the area was not in <br />good condition in the beginning and that O'Neal had been asked to <br />repair and replace only those areas which he had damaged. Mr. <br />McMahon stated that he did not feel it would be fair to hold the <br />contractor responsible for the condition of the sidewalks prior to <br />sewer construction. Mr. Young stated that he had previously showed <br />the Board photographs which indicated that O'Neal had driven a <br />bulldozer across the sidewalks. He maintained that, as a result <br />of that, all of the sidewalks were damaged, some more than others. <br />He then asked whether or not O'Neal had actually put in the sidewalks <br />or if the city had done the replacement work. Mr. McMahon stated <br />that this work was added to the contract, and the sidewalks were <br />replaced by O'Neal at his expense because the damage had resulted <br />in his negligence. Mr. McMahon further advised that one of the <br />Engineering Department inspectors had compiled a list of those <br />areas which were damaged and these areas were primarily at the tap <br />locations only. Mr. Young stated that one of the residents had <br />experienced a cave -in as a result of the sewer construction, and <br />it had never been corrected. He expressed concern about who would <br />be held for any damage which might occur in the future. Mr. McMahon <br />stated that the contractor had been asked to take care of the <br />problems in the areas where there was excessive settlement by <br />filling in with dirt and topsoil. He assured Mr. Young that the <br />cave -in was not a problem underneath the sewer lines, but simply a <br />problem of settling dirt above the lines. He stated that, as a <br />result of the complaints received regarding the settling, the <br />Engineering Department had viewed all the sewer lines by means of <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.