Laserfiche WebLink
REGULAR MEETING <br />JULY 21. 1980 <br />the work required. He explained that the city would pay 10% of <br />the total cost, with the balance of the project being funded with <br />federal funds. He estimated that the project would cost approximately <br />$438,782.00. Upon a motion made by Mr. McMahon, seconded by Mr. <br />Hill and carried, the agreement with Consolidated Rail Corporation <br />was approved and executed. <br />COMPLAINT RE: VANDALISM AND CRIME IN AREA OF PINHOOK PARK <br />Mr. Steve Sparks, 2517 Northview Drive, and Mrs. Gus Schaut, 2521 <br />Northview Drive, complained to the Board about the vandalism <br />and crime they were experiencing as residents in the immediate <br />vicinity of Pinhook Park and Lagoon. Mr. Sparks stated that <br />the neighbors had previously requested a traffic study in the <br />area with the hopes of having their street designated for <br />restricted residential parking. He stated that he has approached <br />Mr. Seitz, Park Superintendent, concerning the problem and nothing <br />has been done. He stated that his councilman had suggested that <br />he appear before the Board. He indicated that patrons of the park <br />park illegally in yellow curb areas, in driveways and in front of <br />fire hydrants. Mr. McMahon stated that the petition for restricted <br />residential parking in that area had previously been filed with the <br />Board and the traffic study was underway. Mrs. Schaut felt part <br />of the problem was that the laws were not enforced. She stated <br />that people swim at the south end of the lagoon where they are <br />not allowed to. She also stated that the residents are constantly <br />faced with the problem of trash and litter and even people urinating <br />on lawns en route to the lagoon and back. Mr. Hill stated that <br />the Police Department was aware of the problem in that area and <br />has been and would continue to monitor the situation through its <br />Special Operations Section. Regarding the traffic situation, that <br />matter was still under study, and he hoped that, when the traffic <br />study has been completed, some action could be taken to try and <br />alleviate some of the problems being experienced by the residents. <br />He stated that he could understand why these activities were <br />particularly annoying, probably more so than in other city parks, <br />because of the park's close proximity to the residences. Mrs. <br />Schaut stated that the traffic survey had been taken after the <br />storm which had hit the.city on July 5th and there were not many <br />cars parked in the area. Mr. Kernan stated that the survey of <br />the area had been scheduled in advance, and the survey team had <br />no way of knowing the storm would hit that day. Mr. McMahon stated <br />that most of the items brought to the attention of the Board fell <br />within the jurisdiction of the Park Board. He advised Mr. Sparks <br />and Mrs. Schaut that Mr. Hill would be checking into the matter <br />and would be contacting Mr. Seitz and the Police Chief regarding <br />the problems they had mentioned. <br />ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION NO. 13, 1980 (DISPOSE OF OBSOLETE VEHICLE) <br />RESOLUTION NO. 13. 1980 <br />WHEREAS, it has been determined by the Board of Public <br />Works that the following vehicle is obsolete and <br />deteriorated to the point where repair costs would <br />exceed its value: <br />Police Department <br />Mechanical No. 660, 1979 Chevrolet <br />Serial No. 9H27F131898 <br />WHEREAS, Chapter 186, Acts of 1967, of the Indiana <br />General Assembly, permits the sale of personal <br />property no longer needed or obsolete. <br />NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Public <br />Works of the City of South Bend that the above listed <br />vehicle is obsolete and not needed by the City of <br />South Bend. <br />