Laserfiche WebLink
E <br />REGULAR MEETING FEBRUARY 11, 1980 <br />Mr. Kernan indicated that he recommended that, based in pricing <br />considerations, the Chevrolet Malibu and the Ford LTD's be eliminated. <br />He indicated that the Ford Fairmont had the lowest total unit price <br />of all vehicles bid and had a three miles per gallon difference in <br />estimated miles per gallon; however, a limited slip differential was <br />an option that was not available in the Fairmont package, and he <br />felt that the elimination of this option could result in control <br />problems when road conditions were anything less than ideal. He <br />felt this was a very serious consideration in view of the anticipated <br />heavy use of patrol vehicles under all types of conditions. He <br />recommended that the Board approve the award to Harold Medow for <br />the Dodge Aspen in the amount of $5,941.72 per unit. He stated <br />that he felt the rustproofing could be.eliminated because of <br />the comparatively short life expectancy of the vehicles. He <br />stated that bucket seats had become a part of the package as <br />opposed to bench seats which was necessitated to insure the <br />proper installation of the police radios and for the comfort of <br />the officers. Harold Medow had indicated that the bucket seats <br />could be installed at no additional charge. Although fabric - belted <br />radial tires were not stipulated in the specifications, Mr. Kernan <br />recommended that they be accepted as included in the bid of Harold <br />Medow. He further recommended that the vehicles to be purchased <br />use a 2.7 to 1 differential ratio in an effort to achieve increased <br />gas mileage. Mr. McMahon summarized that the recommendations <br />included the use of fabric - belted radial tires, elimination of <br />the rustproofing, installation of bucket seats versus the bench - <br />type seats, and the 2.7to7.differential ratio. He asked about the <br />bid for the Ford and what effect these changes had, and Mr. Kernan <br />indicated that there would have been an additional cost involved <br />to take care of the changes. Mr. Hill asked which cars the officers <br />preferred, and Chief Spandward Mitchem indicated that they preferred <br />the Aspen. Mr. Robert Potvin, Safety Board Assistant, indicated <br />that both the Fairmont and Aspen had a gear differential ratio of <br />2.7 to 1; however, he recommended that the 2.9 to 1 ratio be <br />accepted. <br />Mr. Kernan submitted a breakdown for the detective vehicles as <br />follows: <br />UNIT PRICE <br />RUSTPROOFING <br />TOTAL UNIT PRICE <br />ESTIMATED MPG <br />AMC CHEVROLET DODGE ASPEN/ <br />CONCORD MALIBU PLYM. `j OILARE <br />$5,432.17 $5,693.97 <br />-0- 80.00 <br />$5,432.17 $5,773.97 <br />22 19 <br />$5,156.60 <br />25.00 <br />$5,181.60 <br />17 <br />FORD FORD <br />FAIRMONT GRANADA <br />$5,209.45 $5,655.96 <br />50.00 50.00 <br />$5,259.45 $5,705.96 <br />22 17 <br />Mr. Kernan indicated that the cost of the Ford Granada and Chevrolet <br />Malibu was substantially higher than those of the other vehicles, and <br />he recommended that they be eliminated. He stated that the Dodge <br />Aspen and Plymouth Volare were the lowest received,, but there was a <br />substantial difference in the estimated miles per gallon ratings. <br />The AMC Concord and Ford Fairmont were both rated at 22 miles per <br />gallon; however, the Fairmont had a lower total unit price. He <br />stated that, although the Fairmont was more expensive than the <br />Dodge Aspen and Plymouth Volare, the estimated miles per gallon <br />rating should be seriously considered as an overriding factor <br />in the recommendation. He stated that the performance standards <br />were not as critical in the detective vehicles as the patrol cars, <br />and he recommended that the bid be awarded to Basney Ford for the <br />Fairmont in the amount of $5,259.45. He felt the rustproofing <br />should be considered because the service life would be significantly <br />higher than the patrol vehicles. He stated that the Board had not <br />received any bids on the X /bodies because the manufacturer would <br />not service fleet sales. He stated that Gurley -Leep Buick had <br />submitted a bid on the X /bodies, but it had been rejected because <br />a bid bond had not been included. <br />LJ <br />