Laserfiche WebLink
PUBLIC AGENDA SESSION <br />OCTOBER 21, 2010 312 <br />advisability of doing just one block for a pilot and getting feedback. He noted the number <br />of signatures was impressive but wondered if people really understood the concept. Ms. <br />Yarbrough stated she had conversations with her customers and they did bring up the left <br />turn into a parking space, but they mostly still support the idea. She noted she only had a <br />couple of people against the idea. Mr. Mariani noted there are public safety requirements <br />regarding emergency vehicles and the space on the streets. Mr. Littrell stated it is 15' for <br />each side of the street per Ordinance. Mr. Gilot noted the change in parking would help <br />keep the City in compliance. He added this proposal is predicated on no concrete work, <br />just paint. Mr. Littrell suggested leaving the bump -outs as is, there wouldn't be any <br />spaces gained there. Mr. Mariani noted DTSB talked about closing the alley approach by <br />the old Avon Theater. Mr. Littrell stated that would add about five more parking spaces. <br />He noted they would only be able to get possibly two parking spaces on St. Joseph Street <br />in the South Bend Community School Corporation block, and to accomplish that they <br />would have to wipe out all the markings on St. Joseph Street all the way down to Monroe <br />Street. He noted they may be able to get six spaces in the College Football Hall of Fame <br />block. Mr. Gilot stated they wouldn't be able to put any at the Century Center because it <br />would cause large back -ups in traffic during events at the Century Center. Mr. Gilot <br />requested Mr. Mariani get a table with a map that counts existing parking spaces and how <br />many would be created to get the actuals out there. Mr. Mariani stated he would write a <br />letter to the property owners subject to the final drawing. <br />Encroachment — Christmas Lights, Downtown South Bend <br />Mr. Marco Mariani, Downtown South Bend, presented the Board with an application and <br />pictures of similar Christmas light displays to what he is requesting. He stated he is <br />requesting approval to place LED lights from light pole to light pole, over Michigan <br />Street. He noted the lights were affordable, within his budget. His main concern is <br />keeping required vertical clearance, which he understood to be 14'. Mr. Mariani stated he <br />believed his process would create a 15' to 16' clearance, which would meet or exceed <br />regulations. Mr. Gilot noted the poles in the drawings were thirty foot poles. He <br />suggested the decorative poles downtown would not support the weight of the lights and <br />would have too much sag, possibly even causing the poles to break. Mr. Mariani stated <br />there are no more tall poles on Michigan Street and he would have custom straps made <br />that will eliminate sagging. Mr. Littrell noted that bridges are required to have 14'.6" <br />clearance, but they would also need to talk about clearance away from traffic signals so <br />as not to distract traffic. Mr. Gilot stated they would need to find out what kind of weight <br />and sag the lights would create. He noted they may need to relieve tension already on the <br />poles and remove any other unnecessary weight. Mr. Gilot stated the legal requirement of <br />14'6" clearance must be met, and informed Mr. Mariani he is signing an Indemnification <br />and Hold Harmless form. He noted Mr. Mariani should be very careful to make sure <br />nothing and nobody is Aamaged or. hurt. He requested. Mr. Mariani work with the <br />vendor's downtown on the installation. Mr. Gilot stated he was not approving the request <br />at this point; he would need to see a weight and sag report on the lights being hung from <br />the decorative poles first.. <br />Award Quotation _ Cleaning and Rehabilitation of North Wells Nos. 2 & 5 <br />Mr. John Wiltrout, Water Works, stated he is not recommending the award of this quote <br />to the lowest bidder. He noted Ortman, the low bidder, gave references for cleaning a 20" <br />well, a requirement of the specs, that were unsubstantiated. The referenced company <br />stated they never had 20" wells; their wells were 12 ". Therefore, Mr. Wiltrout stated he <br />found Ortman's quote non - responsive to the specs and was recommending the Board <br />award the quote to the second lowest responsive bidder, Peerless Midwest. Attorney <br />Cheryl Greene noted there was only a $278.00 difference between the two quotes. <br />Agreement — Zayo Bandwidth, LLC <br />Mr. John Wiltrout, Water Works, noted this agreement is for authorizing Zayo access to <br />the water tower for placement of communications equipment. Attorney Cheryl Greene <br />noted that part of the property is leased and the signature of the property owner is <br />required before proceeding. Mr. Wiltrout noted the company requested to piggy -back on <br />an existing agreement, changing the terms to five years. Mr. Dave Tungate, Water <br />Works, stated the rent for this agreement has not been received from the marketing group <br />since July 2009. Mr. Littrell questioned whether the Board has the authority to allow this, <br />or if they need to go to the Zoning Board to get a special exemption for a cell tower first. <br />Board Attorney Cheryl Greene questioned whether this is a new installation or upgrade. <br />Mr. Wiltrout stated it is both. Ms. Greene noted we need to look at this more, if the <br />marketing company is not responding. Mr. Gilot stated we want cell towers if they pay us <br />L_ <br />f. <br />1 <br />