Laserfiche WebLink
REGULAR MEETING SEPTEMBER 27, 2010 <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />close to sealing the deal. He has had many employers wanting to move into his building, <br />but because he can’t seem to get the City’s cooperation to close the deal, he is missing the <br />opportunity, not because of financing or anything on his part, it’s the City not getting the <br />job done. Councilmember Henry Davis, Jr., noted a customer service center mentioned <br />at one of the budget meetings and agreed that is something that is sorely needed. But <br />questioned how would that work, cross-training and that sounds like someone is going to <br />lose their job. Not sure if that is a good thing or a bad thing but efficiency is a great <br />thing. He advised that Councilmember Rouse and he went to Ft. Wayne to look at the <br />High Performance Government Network and the Lean Six Sigma. At that workshop they <br />learned that other cities have bought into that network. Councilmember Rouse held a <br />committee meeting with a presentation from the Lean Six Sigma High Performance <br />Government Network. After the presentation it was discussed with the City <br />Administration and decided that this was not something the City was interested at that <br />time and felt that they could do a better job of streamlining government on our own. <br />Councilmember Henry Davis stated how ironic it is that here we are two years later <br />asking the same question of streamlining government and doing more with less. He also <br />heard bike lanes mentioned in one of the presentations, and stated that the people that he <br />represents in his district don’t care about bike lanes, it’s not a concern that they are <br />interested in. He stated that there was an increase in the Local Option Income Tax <br />(LOIT) that he proudly voted against, along with a major sewer rate increase, but did not <br />hear about the 6 million dollars that was put in by the City to fund a new sewer system <br />for Notre Dame (he wasn’t absolutely sure on the dollar amount.) However, he stated <br />that in his district the CSO project on Bonds Avenue has been quite an ordeal for the <br />residents of that neighborhood and they are still dealing with it. Councilmember Henry <br />Davis noted that it has been said time and time again that a large percentage of the <br />general fund budget goes towards public safety. He noted that was a significant number <br />considering that the remaining 19% must go to fund other departments. He also stated <br />that when a problem arises in his district his constituents have to call him because they <br />can’t seem to get any satisfaction. Councilmember Henry Davis feels that he should not <br />have to call various departments to follow up to get things done that employees of the <br />city should be able to handle and rectify. He stated that he doesn’t mind doing it, but <br />should not have to. <br /> <br /> Mr. Zientara clarified what has to happen next. He stated that first the assessed value <br />has to be certified. Secondly, the Council and the City Administration have to adopt the <br />budget. Third, after passage and approval he will submit the budget to the Department of <br />Local Government Finance and they will make the determination on the tax rate based on <br />the approved budget. <br /> <br />There being no one present wishing to speak to the Council either in favor of or in <br />opposition to these bills. Councilmember Dieter made a motion to recommend Bill No. <br />52-10 to the full Council favorably. Councilmember Rouse seconded the motion which <br />carried by a voice vote of eight (8) ayes and one (1) nay (Councilmember Henry Davis.) <br />Additionally, Councilmember Dieter made a motion set this bill for Third Reading on <br />September 30, 2010. Councilmember Rouse seconded the motion which carried by a <br />voice vote of eight (8) ayes and one (1) nay (Councilmember Henry Davis.) <br />Councilmember Oliver Davis made a motion to continue Bill No. 53-10 in the Council <br />Portion Only, until the October 11, 2010 meeting of the Council. Councilmember White <br />seconded the motion which carried by a voice vote of nine (9) ayes. Councilmember <br />Dieter made a motion to continue Bill No. 54-10 in the Council Portion Only, until the <br />October 11, 2010 meeting of the Council. Councilmember White seconded the motion <br />which carried by a voice vote of nine (9) ayes. <br /> <br /> <br />BILL NO. 56-10 PUBLIC HEARING ON A BILL OF THE <br />COMMON COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTH <br />BEND, INDIANA, FIXING THE ANNUAL PAY <br />AND MONETARY FRINGE BENEFITS OF <br />POLICE OFFICERS OF THE SOUTH BEND <br />POLICE DEPARTMENT FOR CALENDAR <br />YEARS 2011, 2012 AND 2013 <br /> 7 <br /> <br />