My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04/12/1932 Board of Public Works Minutes
sbend
>
Public
>
Public Works
>
Minutes
>
1932
>
04/12/1932 Board of Public Works Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/16/2024 11:33:36 AM
Creation date
1/11/2018 1:31:04 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board of Public Works
Document Type
Minutes
Document Date
4/12/1932
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
.1932. <br />Tuesday, April l2th ., <br />Installa Lion of a 2500 lumen light a t the corner of Phillippa Street <br />and ford Street at a cost of $35 .00 per year. <br />Installation of a, 4000 lumen light at the corner of LaSalle Avenue <br />and Tyyckenj')am Drive at a cost of $45.00 per near. <br />Ins tally ti on of a 1000 Jumen light at the corn r of Dayton Street <br />and Carroll street at a c cis t of $22.00 per year. <br />The f. ollan;inf- letter from the Ne-vr York Central Railmad Company <br />was re--d and placed. on file: <br />NE 7 YORK CENTRI^.L RAILROAD COr:TA.NY <br />TIE L.11:.'7E ERIE & PITTSBtTRGH R-P ILROAD C01,PANY <br />77. F. Schaff , <br />General _a"nager <br />1-r. 1". E(,1ward Doran, Chairm,-.n , <br />Board. of Public forks, <br />South Bend, Indian-,-). <br />Den r Sir <br />Cleve la nd. <br />A pr i l 8 th . , 19 32 . <br />In. further reference to our donference on 1-larch 25th . , at which <br />conference, on hehalf of the New York Central, I again requested that the New York <br />Central be given an extension of one year from L'Iarch 1 for the starting of work under <br />its agreement with the City of South Bend for the separation of grades at Division <br />Street, this extension being asked anti based upon the facts set forth in my letter to y <br />You of ?March 3T 1932. This extensi on was requested for one year upon the consideration <br />that Within that time there would be such an improvement in this unusual business <br />depression which would result in the New York Central being financially able to carry <br />out this grade serara.ti on project. <br />It was stated in our last conference that Your Board would like, <br />in view of the fact that there is existing a signed agreement between the City and <br />the New York Central for this grade separation project and the City has expended cer- <br />tain sums of monev do contemplation of the project imrlediately going aheadz. <br />, $o have <br />me advise you as definitely as possible as to the position the New York Central <br />will . take in r ega rd to this improve rant in connection with other improvement s in <br />other communities which are in the process of begotiation, construction, or signed <br />a.greemeazt s existing, similier to our s itua Lion in South Bend, or where age e ement s have <br />not been signed. At our conference I stated and do so now advise you that our Company <br />fully epprec as tes it would be unfair to South Bend to start work of this type in other <br />communities along our Railroad 17,izere agreements covering the work have not been <br />executed or ,T,here the facts are difference. I appreciate that the City of South Bend <br />is entitled to preference over all projects on our property where the conditions are <br />not of an emergency type. In other -words , the New York Central will give this im- <br />provement preference over any- other project where t1- con itions are such that the <br />municipal authorities or�e public authorities have not started tre improvenent or <br />done wank in contemplation of the improvement, as has been done in South Bend. As <br />I advised you at our conference, there are pending in the State of Indiana other im- <br />provernents on our property of this type where agreements have been executeat, where1. <br />public authorities have spent large sums of m-�n.ey in contemplation of the immediate <br />going ahead. with the improvermnt, and I realize that this type of improverent, which <br />is in the sa.rm category as South Bend, must be given preference. As -I further advlsdd <br />you at our confe?ence, it is difficult, in view of these facts, to advise you more <br />definitely in this regard. The New York Central desires to treat the City of South <br />Bend., taking in consideration all the facts involved, with the utmost fairness, and <br />it must necessarily also treat other communities with the sane fairness, and I assume <br />that you would not ask us to do otherwise. <br />I think that knowing our relations in connection with your City <br />in the past and the fact that we have spent a very large sum of money in furtherance <br />Of your grade separ=�tion improvement, that you can be assured that vie 1.ri..11 show the <br />utmost good faith and fairness to you in connection with this present subject matter. <br />With kindest regards, I am, <br />Yours very- truly, <br />• F. Schaff. <br />• <br />L� <br />• <br />• <br />• <br />0 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.