07/12/1954 Board of Public Works Minutes

Home Browse Search

YIELD RIGHT OF WAY SIGNS - On Coquillard at northwest corner of Madison Street On both sides of Cedar Street at Greenlawn Avenue On both sides of Esther at Cedar Street , On Coquillard at northwest corner of Cedar On both sides of Falcon at Jefferson Boulevard. An. excavation Bond in the sum of $5,000.00, binding Edward Sidorowicz, d/b/a Sidts Plumbing & Heating, as principal, and the Continental Casualty Company, as sureties, was examined and approved by the Board. Contractor Bonds, each in the sum. of ,.1$'1,000.00, were examined and approved for the following three contractors: TT H. G. Chritsman Construction Co., Inc. I. D. Lant Lester L. Scott There being no further business to come before the Board, the meeting was adjourned at 11:50 A. M. Attest: Z-Z)A4 h4_0�� Clerk SPECIAL KEETING July 14, 1954 A special me'ekng of the Board of Public Works tiaras held at 10:00 A. M. DST. Mir. Orrie E. Parker was present and submitted drawing for replat of Lots Numbered 14 through 37, and vacated alleys in Parker & Allen1s Addition to the City of South Bend, Indiana. Mr. Parker also filed with the Board Cause No.95120 in the St. Joseph Circuit Court, which decree covers vacation proceedings of the original plat which reads as follows: STATE OF INDIANA ) SS: S T. JO SE P H C OUN TY COLPAERT REALTY CORPORATION ) VS DECREE THE CITY OF SOUTH BEND, INDIANA ) AND CITIZENS THEREOF Comes now the plaintiff, Colpaert Realty Corporation, by its attorneys, Parker & Parker; and comes also the City of South Bend, Indiana by its attorney, Irving Hurwich; and come also Blanche 1.1. Dice and Helen Culver.by their attorney, George Rulison, and Louise Cannady, Herschell Hartzell and wife, and Dren_man G. Tatman and Hilda A. Tatman by their attorneys, Anderson &.7attles; and this cause, being at issue upon plaintiff's petition and the answers of The City of South Bend, Indiana and other interested persons who have appeared and represented by their said counsel, is now submitted to the court without the intervention of a jury. And the Court, having heard said petition, together with argument of counsel and the evidence thereon, and being duly advised in the premises, finds: 1. That the allegations of plaintiff's petition are true with the exception that the Lot Numbered Thirty-two (32) in said Parker & Allen Addition as originally pla.tte is owned by Blanche 14. Dice and Helen Culver, and that plaintiff has no interest in ten (10) feet off the North side of said Lot Numbered Thirty-two (32) as alleged in its petition. 2. That plaintiff's purpose of increasing the size of the lots in said Parker & Allen Addition so that all lots are accessible from the street line is consistent w th the purposes of good planning in said City and is to the best interests of the community. That the omission of alleys from said Addition relieves the burden of 1] 0 0 0 0