My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
HPC Administrative Record
sbend
>
Public
>
Common Council
>
Legislation
>
Upcoming Bills
>
2017
>
11-13-2017
>
2017 Boyd v. HPC
>
HPC Administrative Record
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/6/2017 9:01:48 AM
Creation date
11/8/2017 2:54:13 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council - City Clerk
City Counci - Date
9/5/2017
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
88
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
roof. I don't know that as a fact, but I'm positive it'll be less, with some of this material possibly <br /> being reused, or other donated material." Exhibit"I" at 2:34:37. <br /> The Commission also went above and beyond its mandate by giving suggestions to Mr. <br /> Boyd for places he could look for additional funding if he needed financial assistance. <br /> Commissioner Hertel in particular made several suggestions for community grants and funding, <br /> and Executive Director Feasel stated that HPC had suggested Mr. Boyd look into Indiana <br /> Landmarks and Community Investment for funding options. Exhibit"I" at 2:36:40. <br /> Commissioner Molnar specifically stated that while the current roof design was too far from <br /> design standards for him to approve it, he hoped"we can come to some compromise that isn't as <br /> financially crazy as a flat roof." Exhibit"I"at 2:53:59. Commissioner Klusczinski encouraged <br /> Mr. Boyd to withdraw the current application and to research whether or not reusing the <br /> materials that had already been installed in the current configuration could be used for a different <br /> version of the roof and make a new presentation to the Commission. Id. Commissioner <br /> Klusczinski advised Mr. Boyd that if he withdrew his application to research these issues then <br /> the fee would be preserved and rolled into the next application. Id. In the final statement on <br /> financial hardship during the consideration of COA Application No. 2017-0602A, Commissioner <br /> Anderson stated outright that HPC was "not asking for that $40,000, $30,000 flat roof proposal, <br /> we're talking about work you could possibly do on your own as a licensed contractor to create <br /> that hipped roof. We're not looking to outstrip any resources that you have, we're looking at <br /> what is also available through you, to you,to be able to do this project in a way that makes all <br /> parties happy, and makes that building happy." Exhibit "I" at 2:55:30. Mr. Boyd stated in reply <br /> that he wanted to go forward with the vote on the current application instead. <br /> 14 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.