My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
HPC Administrative Record
sbend
>
Public
>
Common Council
>
Legislation
>
Upcoming Bills
>
2017
>
11-13-2017
>
2017 Boyd v. HPC
>
HPC Administrative Record
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/6/2017 9:01:48 AM
Creation date
11/8/2017 2:54:13 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council - City Clerk
City Counci - Date
9/5/2017
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
88
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mr. Boyd's financial hardship was considered multiple times during the June 19, 2017 <br /> public hearing. Mr. Boyd told Commissioner Gordon that the main purpose of changing the <br /> style of the roof to the new style was economics. See Exhibit"I"at 2:19:16. Commissioner <br /> Gordon confirmed that the economic reasons in question were that Mr. Boyd could get material <br /> donated or cheaply and do the construction himself, which would be unlikely if the new roof <br /> were flat. See Exhibit"I" at 2:19:50. Commissioners Buccellato, Klusczinski, and Gordon <br /> suggested that the materials which had already been expended into the current roof system be <br /> repurposed, in order to save Mr. Boyd the expense of purchasing all new materials to change the <br /> roof to something more appropriate. Exhibit"I"at 2:29:03. Mr. Boyd brought up the hardship <br /> issue himself, later in the public hearing, which resulted in extensive discussion. Exhibit"I" at <br /> 2:29:03. Commissioner Klusczinski explained his view of the hardship consideration. In the <br /> hearing minutes, a public comment from Mr. Mike Boyd asked, "Could this application be <br /> withdrawn and come back with application with different options for roof—different dimensions <br /> and/or style?" Elicia Feasel,the Executive Director of the HPC, replied by reminding the HPC <br /> and all listeners present that when denying COA 2016-0809 for the same roof project, four of the <br /> Commissioners specifically requested Mr. Boyd obtain additional quotes and estimates for <br /> different design options. Mr. Boyd failed to present any quotes for keeping an in-kind flat roof. <br /> According to Mr. Boyd, the reason he did not bring any new quotes for a new roof was, "there's <br /> no funding for the roof." Exhibit"I"at 2:33:09. Commissioner Gordon specifically advised Mr. <br /> Boyd that the Commission"understand the cost of a new flat rubber roof,that's why we're <br /> giving you the option to bring us some kind of a design that's less obtrusive than this one here, <br /> that is more hidden, because that won't probably be the expense of a new flat rubber material <br /> 13 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.