Laserfiche WebLink
I <br /> Karl Nichols, Gethsemane Church of God, 308 South Walnut—church adjacent to the land Eric <br /> owns. They own property between viaduct and Firehouse and are in the process of developing it. <br /> It is not appropriate to leave the Firehouse vacant and abandoned. The neighborhood is growing. <br /> No one cares what the building looks like;they care that it is not vacant. Please approve the COA. <br /> Kirstin Champer, 1240 West Thomas: Supports project not just because she is Eric's wife, but <br /> because of what its improvement has done for the community. This building is becoming a <br /> community hub. Before the windows were boarded up,kids were breaking them out. A lot of the <br /> things Eric is doing takes into consideration the area where this building is located. A new roof is <br /> necessary to preserve the building, but a flat roof may not drain as well, and is economically not <br /> feasible. At the end of the day, it came down to saving the building and securing the community <br /> or making the roof look pretty. It's not a cute roof,but in this case,it comes down to purpose over <br /> aesthetics,for the safety of the building and the protection of the community. <br /> Gloria Jones,2705 Fredrickson: You need to understand the history of the firehouse. It's not like <br /> Tippecanoe Place or Kizer House. It is a simpler structure that's part of the fabric of the local <br /> neighborhood. The Commissioners assured that this building is just as important as Tippecanoe or <br /> any other landmark. <br /> Commissioner Gordon moved to deny application as submitted. Seconded by Commissioner <br /> Anderson. No further discussion.President Klusczinski clarified that votes in the affirmative will <br /> support the motion to deny the application and reminded the members to state their reasons when <br /> voting. Roll call was ordered. <br /> Commissioner Hertel(AYE)—under Standards and Guidelines Group B Section C this would alter <br /> and modify the structure and change it greatly by adding this type of roof; plus, we are lacking <br /> information on the materials to be used for completion of the roof. <br /> Commissioner Bucceilato(AYE)—The design simply does not meet the existing character of the <br /> structure. <br /> Commissioner Anderson (AYE)—It would alter the facade, architectural integrity, and its style, <br /> which are some of the most important things we have to make a decision on as a Commission. <br /> Commissioner Gordon(AYE)—It is not in keeping with the guidelines for this building, does not <br /> keep the historical character or look of the building, and we are missing some information of how <br /> that roof would be covered. <br /> Commissioner Klusczinski(AYE)—Ordinance 9037-99 designating 1240 West Thomas Street as <br /> a Local Landmark details a number of stylistic features,specifically two-story Period Revival Fire <br /> Station with fiat roof and limestone parapet coping. Long term preservation of the structure and <br /> safety of its occupants are not served by the installation which is both inadequate and architecturally <br /> inappropriate. I affirm the staff recommendation for flat roof and the noted remedies for violations <br /> of Minimum Maintenance Standards and seek the support of this body, the Building Department, <br /> Code Enforcement, and the owner's cooperation to effect changes that will preserve this unique <br /> and special building. I also believe that the current roof being proposed is not in keeping with the <br /> Standards and Guidelines that the Commission must use in review of all the local historic <br /> landmarks under its jurisdiction. I believe that other more appropriate remedies exist and should <br /> be explored instead of granting this particular application. <br /> Commissioner Molnar (AYE) — The design is too far outside of the mandated Standards and <br /> Guidelines which the Commission, by law,must follow. The roof would be prominent in display <br /> in the front of the structure, as opposed to the rear. I would be in favor of looking at something <br /> with a lower pitch,not necessarily a flat roof. <br /> None opposed. Vote: 6—0 <br /> COA 42017-0602A Denied. <br /> 8. 821 Ashland COA#2017-0605 Chapin Park <br /> 15 <br />