My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Approving progress report under the Workable Program for Community Improvement
sbend
>
Public
>
Common Council
>
Legislation
>
Resolutions/Special Resolutions
>
1968
>
Approving progress report under the Workable Program for Community Improvement
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/17/2017 8:21:41 AM
Creation date
5/17/2017 8:21:33 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council - City Clerk
City Council - Document Type
Resolutions
City Counci - Date
6/24/1968
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
40
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
4 <br /> I <br /> i1INUTES OF THE IZAYOR'S ADVISORY M11ITTEE OPT COI.DU.IITY I.IPROVEI NT <br /> ��leeting of June 11, 1968 <br /> The meeting was opened at 7:30 p.m. by Chairman, Prichard Geib. Those being present <br /> were as follows: <br /> Janet Allen :Iartha Erickson Josephine Curtis <br /> J. Chester Allen Sam 'dinston :ors. Nathan Levy <br /> Jerry hickey Ruth Price 'Nary Hahn <br /> O'Dell Newburn 'Iarcus Engdahl Dick Geib <br /> The Chairman announced that the purpose of this meeting was to begin the process of <br /> concluding the activities of the various subcommittees which were established last <br /> month. A report from each subcommittee chairman of their activities was requested. <br /> The first report was given by Jerry rickey who is the chairman of the subcomitee <br /> looking into current minimum housing, codes and the possible involvement of South <br /> Bend in a Federal Code Compliance Program. <br /> Mr. Hickey's subcommittee, Demolition and Code Enforcement SubCommittee, has met <br /> on several occasions in the past month and has reviewed with the Building Commissioner <br /> and the Department of Redevelopment the current minimum housing code with which the <br /> City of South Bend is operating. After discussion of the subcommittee with those <br /> Department heads effected, the committee found that the current minimum housing code <br /> was outdated and that it should be either updated or replaced. It was the concensus <br /> of opinion that the recommendation of the Building Commissioner to replace the <br /> current code with the minimum housing code published by the Building Officials <br /> Conference of i1merica (BOCA) should be recommended to the trayor and Common Council. <br /> The subcormiittee also looked into the desirability and necessity of increasing the <br /> Code Compliance Program now being carried out by the Substandard Building Division <br /> of the Building Department. It was found that the level of inspections, the number <br /> of inspectors and the compliance efforts were adequate to meet minimum guide lines <br /> as set forth in the ":lorkable Program. However, it was felt by the subcommittee <br /> that this level of code enforcement and code compliance was inadequate to solve <br /> the problem of the ever increasing number of substandard housing units within the <br /> City and that a larger effort should be made in order to solve this problem. <br /> The committee, therefore, with the assistance of the Building Commissioner, the <br /> Executive Director of the Area Plan Commission and the Department of Redevelopment <br /> studied the possibility of entering into a federally-assisted Code Enforcement <br /> Program which would be in addition to the cur-ent level of code enforcement <br /> activities. The area selected for study following the suggestion of several <br /> members of the committee and the Director of the Area Plan was the northeast <br /> neighborhood sometimes referred to as the Hill Street Area. With the assistance <br /> of the Department of Redevelopment, this area was broken down into three possible <br /> target areas and the structures in the area rated as to substandard condition as <br /> well as assessment of need for some possible improvements in these areas. Priority <br /> rating of the three areas was then evolved based on the greatest need for systematic <br /> involvement efforts and then cost developed to estimate the feasibility of financing <br /> of such a program. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.